Boobs!
Well, half of them anyway...
i was just thinking about something someone said on another thread.
to paraphrase, 'jw beliefs like there being no hellfire, immortal soul, the condition at death...have the ring of truth.'.
i realized, atheists believe these things too!.
Boobs!
Well, half of them anyway...
Did he at any point actually offer a definition of "sinning against the Holy Spirit"?
No, he didn't have any fingerpaint so it will have to wait.
it seems the producers of jw broadcasting read my earlier post here at jwd.org about the swedish chef.. because they introduces the swedish chef in their program now.
.
the broadcasting is surprising me more and more every month, a must see (if you can).. compare:.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4
Sbf: help me out, didnt you say what was true was what people agreed were true?
do you mean that the word true has no meaning on rorty Island?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4
SBF: I will get to my point in a moment, first I want to understand your view on the matter.
On Rorty island, how *ought* people find out what is true? For instance in a trial?
Or is there no *ought*? i.e. is it all relative and any method is equally valid?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4
Sbf: okay so that might be the psychology of why they believe something, i am interested in why they ought believe something on your view.
is that also common interest and if so how do they determine what is their common interest?