bohm

Joined

• started 191 topics
• posted 7,847 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by bohm

• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  At the conclusion. Sorry fighting a non english spell checker on an ipad
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  I meant did carrier really write that about his wife or is it trolling?
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  But do you KNOW he made consessions?

  empiricism is self-refuting as a general statement about all knowledge. This does not mean we cant use our senses to revise and inform our beliefs about the world, which is the important part. For instance, did you use your senses in the process of arriving to the conclusion rorty made consessions?
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Is that for real?? Did he really say that?
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Sbf: but then if i point out i agree with nearly everything BR has said and that quote is misleading in isolation your just gonna shrug and go: so what, guy cant be trusted?

  I realize your partly yanking our chains, but come on. I bet even rorty has said the earths round or some other crazy thing :-)
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Then why quote him?
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  i got to say my view of carrier has grown a bit dim in recent years, he sometimes say wrong things and appear to be quite guided by a need to win debates than following the evidence
• 
  62

  Richard Carrier debunks Christianity using Science and History.

  by Island Man in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ez2kgjk4jo4

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Sbf-- you got to read rusesell in context, he is very symphatic to the British enlightenment over Continental philosophy
• 
  133

  What are the biggest holes in evolution?

  by shadow in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  how honest are the proponents of evolution?

  idk but curious to see what type of response there is on a topic like this or does their study only seek to confirm their preconceptions and ignore uncomfortable facts?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Evolution of basic cellular machinery; no direct evidence and indirect evidence such as genetics and molecular homology has been degraded by billions of years of subsequent evolution.
• 
  25

  I predicted a lottery number from a pattern, is the lottery NOT random or is random held to a universal force?

  by EndofMysteries in

  1. social
  2. current

  i've studied and observed several lottery patterns.

  this one is now gone so nothing lost by revealing it.

  i had a certain history search and noticed that almost each week the past few months a list of numbers not used recently were being used 1 per week.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  bohm

  Another pattern I have noticed is the lottery numbers are often even (like, at least 50% of the time) and that the Illuminati tends to change the pattern whenever I have figured it out to prevent me from winning even though I am nearly always right retrospectively in my predictions.