why are we making an issue over pronouncing Jehovah the hebrew way when we use the English version of Jesus that is definitely not pronounced as the original?
cattails
JoinedPosts by cattails
-
105
Does the name Jehovah actually exist in the original Hebrew language?
by Yizuman insource: http://www.familybible.org/articles/messianic/jehovah.htm.
well, then, where did the word jehovah come from?.
thus the artificial name jehovah came into being.. (yahweh, the new encyclopedia britannica, vol.
-
cattails
-
105
Does the name Jehovah actually exist in the original Hebrew language?
by Yizuman insource: http://www.familybible.org/articles/messianic/jehovah.htm.
well, then, where did the word jehovah come from?.
thus the artificial name jehovah came into being.. (yahweh, the new encyclopedia britannica, vol.
-
cattails
Yahweh is not 2 sylables in Hebrew, it is in fact 4, phonetically speaking: YeYahOuWeh
That's just plain wrong. Do you even realize the nonsense you just spewed?
Good grief!
-
27
As of July 1st No more reimbursements directly to CO's etc. from congregations.
by cattails inwell if i read it correctly it seems that at the spanish extj.com forum.
there's a letter (in spanish of course) saying there's a change in the.
way reimbursement of expenses are going to be made for co's, and.
-
cattails
Well if I read it correctly it seems that at the Spanish ExTJ.com forum
there's a letter (in Spanish of course) saying there's a change in the
way reimbursement of expenses are going to be made for CO's, and
others. The new arrangement I think is that the CO will send his amount
for expenses to the Branch and then the Branch will bill the congregations.
There's not going to be any more secret contributions to the CO's or so
it seems to say. What do you think? No more green handshakes?
http://www.extjforo.com/foro/showthread.php?t=14346
SUP.VIAJANTES-SUS GASTOS LOS PAGARÁ LA SUCURSAL-2009-1.pdf (259.1 KB)
http://www.extjforo.com/foro/attachment.php?attachmentid=4195&d=1247236869
SUP.VIAJANTES-SUS GASTOS LOS PAGARÁ LA SUCURSAL-2009-2.pdf (88.5 KB)
http://www.extjforo.com/foro/attachment.php?attachmentid=4196&d=1247236894
-
40
I can't take it anymore ...
by compound complex inweak coffee.
i use drip and never seem to get the measurement right.
at the moment i'm on high octane, shifting into high gear .... i believe this morning's brew is akin to espresso in volatility.. any suggestions as to an exact quantity of cafe per 8-cup coffee maker?.
-
cattails
I like to use a flat-table-spoon-full per cup of water.
If you like it stronger use a slightly rounded table-spoon-full.
That seems to work for my drip CoffeMate.
I used to have a little espresso machine that you set on the
gas stove, it had several parts to it and it looked like an hour
glass shape of sorts, made out of thick aluminum I think.
It made excellent coffee. But it got lost in one of the moves
to another house, sigh! Someone someplace is probably
sipping good espresso as a result, oh well.
-
105
Does the name Jehovah actually exist in the original Hebrew language?
by Yizuman insource: http://www.familybible.org/articles/messianic/jehovah.htm.
well, then, where did the word jehovah come from?.
thus the artificial name jehovah came into being.. (yahweh, the new encyclopedia britannica, vol.
-
cattails
Look Undie, I'm not the one misunderstanding anything about it here.
When you translate a name you use whichever pronunciation is common in that language.
If you translate Peter into Spanish then you get Pedro. Which one is the correct pronunciation?
They are both correct, you *&%$!
The traditional name in English for the Hebrew tetragram is Jehovah. As long as the four
consonants are represented JHVH/YHWH then the name is translated, if you like the
more scholastic Yahweh or the more traditional Jehovah is entirely up to you.
Ancient Hebrew didn't use vowel markers only later were the vowel points added
and sometimes the vowel points match (a bit) with Adonay or with Elohim, but a lot
of the time they match with Shema, so the Adonay superstition is just some guy's
explanation that suited his fancy.
If you want to keep arguing about it go ahead. But I suggest you read up from more
than the idiotic sources you're using now.
-
105
Does the name Jehovah actually exist in the original Hebrew language?
by Yizuman insource: http://www.familybible.org/articles/messianic/jehovah.htm.
well, then, where did the word jehovah come from?.
thus the artificial name jehovah came into being.. (yahweh, the new encyclopedia britannica, vol.
-
cattails
PS, how is it not a translation? Who says it isn't a translation?
Do people who say Jehovah mean the same entity as Ancient
Hebrews who wrote the tetragram? I think certainly think so.
Do people who say Jesus today mean the same person as those
who pronounced the name in Greek, or Hebrew, or Aramaic or
even Latin in Jesus own day? I think certainly think so.
The pronunciation issue is a very misunderstood point and this
thread is being discussed by people who persist in making stupid
points. I'm really getting fed up with the nonsense.
-
105
Does the name Jehovah actually exist in the original Hebrew language?
by Yizuman insource: http://www.familybible.org/articles/messianic/jehovah.htm.
well, then, where did the word jehovah come from?.
thus the artificial name jehovah came into being.. (yahweh, the new encyclopedia britannica, vol.
-
cattails
Jehovah is the English transliteration of the Hebrew letters for God's name.
There is no "Jesus" in Hebrew or Greek, there's no Peter, those are English
names. They are approximate transliterations of the names so that they fit
in with English pronunciations... In Spanish the name of God is pronounced
Hay-Oh-BAH, and Jesus as Hay-SOOS, and Peter is Pay-DROH.
So the pronunciation isn't important if the people know who you're referring to
and if that's the way it is traditionally pronounced in that particular language.
So it may have been Yahweh in Ancient Hebrew, but it's ok to say Jehovah in
modern English, and Jehová (pronounced Hay-Oh-BAH) in modern Spanish.
The thing with the substitution of vowels doesn't matter, Hebrew pronunciation
today isn't what it was in Abraham's, nor Moses, not even King David's day.
Heck, English pronunciation today has changed from what it was through
the centuries... (It's a you say toe-may-doe I say toe-mah-toe kind of thing).
-
40
1942 Consolation on Beth Sarim PDF
by cabasilas inthe may 27, 1942 consolation (the precusor to awake!
) contained a lengthy 16 page article about the failed attempts of the watchtower society to bury judge rutherford at his beloved home in san diego, beth sarim.
it contains a fascinating look into the place beth sarim held for jws during this period.
-
cattails
You can get the view on street level and do a walk-about the block in Google Street View.
Just go to the link posted and grab the little orange human figure and drag the circle under
his (I'm assuming the little orange dude is a guy) feet and dump it on the street you want to
virtually walk through. It's pretty cool.
-
71
What Religion Are You?
by homeschool ini see that there are many people on here who've left the jw's and are still christians...but i wonder what type?
non denominational?
has anyone changed to something completely different like hindu or buddhism?
-
cattails
The kind of religion spoken of at James 1:27.
I consider myself first of all a Christian (albeit
oppressed by WT weeds here and there).
-
44
The most absurd comments yet about oral sex !!!
by Sour Grapes ini visited a kh today with my wife and the brother who gave the public talk.
said that there is so much unnatural use of the sex organs by the world's.
youth, that the medical field is encouraging all parents with children 12 years.
-
cattails
It helps if you don't pay attention to the speaker while he's talking.
That's exactly right!
I found out by trial and error that if you don't pay attention your
retention rate of points covered in the outline of the talk is the same
exactly 1/2 hour after listening to the Public Talk at a Kingdom Hall.
Actually by taking a learned guess after hearing the title you can
paraphrase most of the content of the talk even without attending.
The talks are mostly the same information over and over by different
guys. The only thing that wakes people up is throwing out inflamatory
statements like oral sex will cause cancer, but the risk is that now
everyone in the hall is mentally picturing the act of oral sex while the
speaker moves on to the same old repeated points from the outline.