does anyone know if the chairman's introductions and announcements are completely scripted?
particularly with the use of adjectives and adverbs when introducing talks and speakers.. 'as we listen intentedly....'.
'we eagerly look forward to bro so and so's talk'.
Indeed they are scripted - or at least there were when I saw them. Even to the extent of the instructions which says that the chairman should adhere strictly to those words.
When I was doign the sound at CAs and DAs I remember on more than occassion Chairmen complaining that they have to use words that they were not comfortable with.
ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.
can someone maybe explain that a little?
if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.
And still scholar refuses to acknowledge the connection of this "all time- all important" date of 1914 being tied to Russel and a Pyramid..... go Billy!
ok, this is driving me nuts for whatever reason i cant get past the bolded part.
can someone maybe explain that a little?
if this even makes sense, im usually not t his dense, i've been reading this for ever and for some reason i keep getting thrown off track at that part.
I always thought Ezra was a 'copyist' - that doesn't even make him a journalist let alone an historian!
So many assertations and yet not one shred of proof...... why don't you respond to Billy the X about the Pyramid connections?
okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.
even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.
the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.
Chronology not contrived? You've got to be kidding right? You can't have studied the WTS' latest view of "a generation"
okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.
even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.
the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.
If Jehovah is not happy with 607 BCE so pray tell what date is he happy with?
That's an easy one..... the date he alone has set and knows! Don't forget Jesus stated he (Son of Man) doesn't know.... so why would the WTS know and reveal it? Delusional to the extreme.
the issue at hand is who first of all introduced the substance of Young's articles which was Methodology and its importance in Chronology
Smoke and mirrors! The issue at hand is where did 607 come from? Something you've still NEVER verified with any degree of veracity.... nor will you ever! Don't forget there is the issue of Pyramidolgy you have to factor in when coming to your conclusion of 607BCE or will you miss that out too - as if the book "Divine Plan of the Ages" was never written?
Oh - as thread stealer, just when were the WT Scholars celebrated (and by whom) if you're so into Chronology? Indeed. Should they have been celebrated at all?
okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.
even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.
the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.
Jehovah is very happy with 607 BCE because .......
I suppose it's too much to ask for proof?
okay so we've obviously established on this board that 607 is not the correct date that babylon destroyed jerusalem.
even before 1914 came around, the bible students still thought 1914 would be a pivital date.
the only way they can gain that info is from the 7 times or w/e.
I can't believe nobody has yet mentioned Russel's "pyramid inches" which suddenly had to me re-measured to make the dates (sorry, Bible Chronolgy) correct. Tsk....
Pivotal to the whole gamut of JW doctrine is the year 1914.... if that is proven wrong, which it has been quite emphatically, then the veracity of any thing they write upon this foundation is quite fraudulent. The guilt they carry reaches clear to the heavens!
I really do like the Portugese donkey and two little sticks - most apposite.
And the cricket...... are England going to cause an Australian whitewash? Must focus on the positives..... Murray's still playing at Wimbledon.
Well, at least one of the teams won't make the next round..... what goes around (eventually) comes around!
The only success story of the World Cup?
Vuvuzela manufacturing..... what a DIN!
