Hey everybody :)
So I am curious about the JW's on here that are still in good standing. Even after I was DF'd I still had the brainwash in my head telling me not to go onto an internet site discussing JW issues. And I know there are active JW's on here. So I'm curious, to all those active JW's in good standing, what makes you come on here? Curiosity? A bit of revelry in rebellion? Seeking answers to questions that aren't being addressed at meetings or in the publications? Are you an apostate staying within the ranks to cause divisions (graphic)? Are you unhappy and in need of an outlet, perhaps for the time being you are "stuck" in the JW's? What is it?
Posts by feenx
-
18
Are You A Witness In Good Standing?
by feenx inhey everybody :)
so i am curious about the jw's on here that are still in good standing.
even after i was df'd i still had the brainwash in my head telling me not to go onto an internet site discussing jw issues.
-
feenx
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
I'm actually surprised he stayed as long as he did.
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
Veradico: AWESOME! You couldn't have hit a bigger nail harder on the head.
And any such appeal to God's authority is motivated by what is published in a Watchtower publication which comes from the writings of imperfect men. -
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
Grassyknoll: Because stating that it is partially the work of Satan implies that being gay is evil when other than select statements in the Bible there is no evidence that it is evil, and the many wonderful gay people in the world are a testatment to the fact that there is nothing wrong about it. You are right in saying that it is not just JW who claim that homosexuality is wrong. However, as they are the one true religion, having vast knowledge beyond all the masses, it does put them in the spotlight with their views.
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
grassyknoll: You're doing the same thing in your statement. Being hung over is a physical feeling, has nothing to do with emotion. If you're equating a physical feeling to being unhappy, then based on your arguments isn't that the same as someone gaining pleasure from homosexual acts?
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
LMFAO at Dawg and Saywhat29!!!
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
Grassyknoll: I did not say that the article specifically stated it was 50/50. You said that “… the article said homosexuality may or may not be genetic.”
What that means is that there is just as likely a chance that it IS genetic as it is likely that it is NOT, per the WTBS stance stated in that article referenced by you. According to that statement, both options are EQUALLY viable. That is unless your paraphrase was incorrect.
However, suppression is clearly stated as the correct course of action, as stated in the article you just quoted:
“But they fight that unnatural, Satan-inspired desire—and they do not give in to it.”
By that very sentence they are stating a different opinion than what you read in the Young People Ask article in regards to the possibility of genetic motivators for homosexual tendencies.
So is this change in opinion, from the 83 Watchtower to the recent Young People Ask article you read a demonstration of “new light,” or is it instead a subtle policy change made my men in an effort to stay within the modest, never too far to either extreme, boundaries of social acceptance?
I think we can all agree that the two statements made are conflicting. As with other issues and practices that become increasingly hard to sustain within the organization, due to changes on society as a whole. This seems to be something that can be re-evaluated as the FS sees fit. -
21
Disfellowshipping Experiences...
by feenx inhey all :)
so i am always curious about fellow ex dubs disfellowshipping experience.
mine was pretty retarded, well they had every reason to df me, but the whole process was asinine.
-
feenx
Well I would agree that it does not make sense to be a part of something that you are not willing to comply with the practices of, regardless of a religion, company, school, etc. I hope he is happy as well.
-
67
homosexuals and JWs
by solidergirl ini have no problem being around gay people.
but bring it up a car group and omg its like the number 1 sin in the world.
it got to point where i wanted to stand up for them.
-
feenx
Great point Gopher!!
So going along with that train of thought....Since the FS does not categorically deny the chance that homosexuality could be genitical, then their stance is that it is just as likely to be gentical as it is not to be genitical, 50/50. If that's the case, then they are admitting there's a good chance that it is genitics, in which case it is a natural human phenomenon. And if it is a natural human thing, isnt there the chance that those Bible writers, being somewhat ignorant in those times, took the actions of homosexual people in that time period as a sign of their "wickedness" simply because those who were open with it were from pagan nations? Could it be that their understanding of human creation, as made by "Jehovah" himself, was inaccurate at the time those words were written? Does it really make sense for a human being, with the same emotions and spirituality as a hetereosexual, to supress his God given desires simply to appease ancient opinions based on ignorance?
If the tables were turned and we as heteros were on the less common side of genetics, than we in turn would be the ones that were unholy based on the Bible for our desires to be with the opposite sex. How can any active Witness, who's purpose it is to proclaim "Jehovah's" love, truly tell someone to supress their natural tendancies? Do you honestly believe any homosexual simply woke up one day and said to themselves "I'm tired of the opposite sex, I'm going to be gay?" I think not. -
21
Disfellowshipping Experiences...
by feenx inhey all :)
so i am always curious about fellow ex dubs disfellowshipping experience.
mine was pretty retarded, well they had every reason to df me, but the whole process was asinine.
-
feenx
Are you saying you're proud that you finally "got him?"