:sacrificial,
:Well you can't prove he doesn't exist with 100% certianty.
No one can disprove a negative assertion. Everyone who has even studied a smidgeon of logic knows that. That is preciesely why true believers always use that logically fallacy when they run out of real arguments.
The classic dub argument in that vein is, "but what if we are RIGHT?" That allows them to escape the task of proving that they are right, which is a great cop out for lazy asses like dubs.
This argument could not even be settled by great philosophers and thinkers like Emmanual Kant. Why not just settle this argument by agreeing that everything in the human realm is based upon perception? Their "reality" is based upon their perception. "Shit" is a swearword, not because the word "shit" is essentially a bad word, but only because so many people perceive it to be such. The word "shit" couldn't give a shit that it might be a good word or a bad word, it is only people's perception that make it what it is.
If one's perception is that there is a God who will kill 6 billion people in the most horrible way possible, then for them their IS such a God. If one's perception is that God doesn't exist, then for them God doesn't exist.
Either way, from all we know and experience in all of human history spanning roughly a million years, God simply does not give a shit about humans alive on earth, so why worry about it?
Well he did ask theists & atheists for the best arguement you can come up with for the existance of God, and as an atheist that was the best I could come up with. The rest of my statement was that you can't disprove the existence of anything else equally absurd either.