Adjusted Knowledge
I feel that I must apologise for my last post. It could be taken as if I am being unhelpful. I'm not. The problem is that there is this wealth of information out there. Some is well researched. Some less. so. However, just because something is less well researched doesn't make it wrong and because something is well researched doesn't make it right either. If the research is biased and/or the documents suspect, then so will be the research.
Tacitus tells us a little about jusus and christians in AD 116. From what I've read, I think that Tacitus is genuine. However, what was his source? He tells us not. At best, Tacitus can only be considered a tertiary source, even at best. I'm not saying that Tacitus was lying but, it is possible that what he wrote was unwittingly based on lie.
Josephus also tells us about jesus in AD 93/94. From what I've read, I think that the original Josphus text was genuine. I also believe that the text relating to jesus was an insert by early christians. Regardless, it's still a secondary source, even at best.
I could go on but, at the end of the day, the evidence that jesus lived an earthly life is flimsy. Basically, even at this point, even with all of our technology, we do not have a definitive answer. It pains me to say this but it all comes down to 'probabilities'. I hate that word. It hurts my brain but that's where we are at.
The more wide the view I take of this whole area, the more convinced I get that god, jesus and the babble are the biggest hoax in Man's chequered history, PROBABLY. However, we must all seek our own truth because, at the end of the day, belief is a personal thing. That's why I suggest you do your own research and come to your own conclusion.
The great pity in all of this is RELIGION - One of Man's greatest mistakes.