So according to that dd are we still under the law? That scripture seems to contradict others, Colossians 2:14, Hebrews ch9 and ch10 for instance.
Paul
luke 16:16... "the law and the prophets were until john" 29ce.
colossians 2:14..nwt(sorry).."by nailing it to the torture stake" 33ce.
paul.
So according to that dd are we still under the law? That scripture seems to contradict others, Colossians 2:14, Hebrews ch9 and ch10 for instance.
Paul
hi peeps.
in the last two weeks i have been thinking of suicide everday.
don't panic i won't do it but cannot get it out of my head.
There is life after the WTS, take it from many here that know.
Where in the UK are you from?
Paul
would like to see how many have accepted jesus christ as the only way, truth and life..
To all the born agains,
Do you not feel that labelling yourself as a Christian, is being judgmental to other religions, or other pathways to God that the rest of the world follow?
Paul
luke 16:16... "the law and the prophets were until john" 29ce.
colossians 2:14..nwt(sorry).."by nailing it to the torture stake" 33ce.
paul.
Hmm seems that the Mosaic law is phased out rather then cutting short. In order for mosaic prophesy to be fulfilled Jesus has to appear and die faithful to be concecrated as King. So John is the begining of the transition by hailing the Messiah has arrived, and Christ's death puts the final nail in the coffin of the Mosaic law
Interesting point yknot.
I have a JW pointing out Matthew 18:17 to me, Jesus is speaking to his disciples, saying to treat the wrongdoer as "a man of the nations"
His argument is that the disciples were Jewish believers, who were under law not to associate with Gentiles, therefore upholding JW disfellowshipping policy. My counter argument has been that the disciples were not under the Mosaic law according to Luke 16:16, that Jesus examples showed that he spoke to people of the nations, therefore his words at Matthew 18:17 cannot mean to shun the individual.
It seems to me that it didn't happen overnight, seems to be phased out as you say.
Paul
luke 16:16... "the law and the prophets were until john" 29ce.
colossians 2:14..nwt(sorry).."by nailing it to the torture stake" 33ce.
paul.
Luke 16:16... "the law and the prophets were until John" 29CE
or
Colossians 2:14..NWT(sorry).."by nailing it to the torture stake" 33CE
Paul
i have been told by a jw that 36ce ends daniels 70 week prophecy, how do they work this out?.
i know the starting point is 455bce, but could someone elaborate?
the guy has stated it as matter of fact, it sort of smells like the 1914 prophecy to me, but may be i'm wrong.. paul.
I have been told by a JW that 36ce ends Daniels 70 week prophecy, how do they work this out?
I know the starting point is 455bce, but could someone elaborate? The guy has stated it as matter of fact, it sort of smells like the 1914 prophecy to me, but may be i'm wrong.
Paul
did the watchtower claim that the scripture at luke 21:24 had been fulfilled?.
they will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations.
jerusalem will be trampled on by the gentiles until the times of the gentiles are fulfilled.. .
In this chapter we will present the Bible evidence proving that the full end of the times of the Gentiles, i.e., the full end of their lease of dominion, will be reached in A.D. 1914; and that date will be the farthest limit of the rule of imperfect men…
Firstly, That at that date the Kingdom of God, for which our Lord taught us to pray, saying, "Thy Kingdom come," will obtain full, universal control, and that it will then be "set up," or firmly established, in the earth, on the ruins of present institutions.
Secondly, It will prove that he whose right it is thus to take the domination will then be present as earth’s new Ruler…
Thirdly, It will prove that some time before the end of A.D. 1914 the last member of the divinely recognized Church of Christ, the "royal priesthood," "the body of Christ," will be glorified with the Head…
Fourthly, It will prove that from that time forward Jerusalem shall no longer be trodden down by the Gentiles…
Fifthly, it will prove that by that date, or sooner, Israel’s blindness will begin to be turned away…
Sixthly, It will prove that the great "time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation," will reach its culmination in a world-wide reign of anarchy…
Seventhly, It will prove that before that date [italics in original] God’s Kingdom, organized in power, will be in the earth and then smite and crush the Gentile image (Dan. 2:34) - and fully consume the power of these kings.
Fairly clear cut to me.
Paul
did the watchtower claim that the scripture at luke 21:24 had been fulfilled?.
they will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations.
jerusalem will be trampled on by the gentiles until the times of the gentiles are fulfilled.. .
The date of the close of that 'battle' is definitely marked in Scripture as October, 1914. It is already in progress, its beginning dating from October, 1874. Zion's Watch Tower, 15 January 1892, page 1355
We see no reason for changing the figures--nor could we change them if we would. They are, we believe, God's dates, not ours. But bear in mind that the end of 1914 is not the date for the beginning, but for the end of the time of trouble.
Zion's Watch Tower, 15 July 1894, page 1677
There are more quotations out there, as to what they were saying prior to 1914.
Paul
did the watchtower claim that the scripture at luke 21:24 had been fulfilled?.
they will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations.
jerusalem will be trampled on by the gentiles until the times of the gentiles are fulfilled.. .
They also split the scripture in two and say the first line was a 1st century fulfilment, whereas the second line was fulfilled in 1914
Paul
i have these couple of jw's quoting this verse at me in an attempt to justify disfellowshipping, pair of morons.. in my letter i wrote you to quit mixing in company with fornicators, 10 not [meaning] entirely with the fornicators of this world or the greedy persons and extortioners or idolaters.
otherwise, you would actually have to get out of the world.
11 but now i am writing you to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man.. why do they not see that these scriptures limit "sinful behaviour" to just a few behaviours, but not only that it doesn't say parents should shun their children.. can't believe how the wt misapplies some scripture and at the same time the individual jw just blindly follows.. just my rant for the day.. paul.
Where in 2 Corinthians is that isaac? I have given my full explanation of how i see 1Cor 5 apply, but must admit i'm a little rusty.
Thanks
Paul