I think that “atheist” is a term that we do not need, in the same way that we don’t need a word for someone who rejects astrology. We simply do not call people “non-astrologers.”
I disagree completely.
He is correct that it would be asinine to call ourselves non-astrologers or a-unicornists, but ONLY because the vast majority of people don't believe in astrology or unicorns.
IF we lived in a world that was preponderantly astrologers, then non-astrologers would be a very useful qualifier.
We should not call ourselves anything. We should go under the radar—for the rest of our lives. And while there, we should be decent, responsible people who destroy bad ideas wherever we find them.
That's what we've been doing for the past 4000+ years, it doesn't work.
We should continue to use the term 'atheist' until it no longer holds meaning, but currently it does.
I look forward to the day when nobody believes in god, except for a tiny minority, and they will debate among themselves whether they want to use the term 'theist' or 'believer' or just go under the radar—for the rest of their lives.
Lore - What.Would.Satan.Do?