Romy's case would indeed be baffling if we take everything the author says as Gospel. But it isn't Gospel now, is it?
That experience is not exactly "scientific evidence". No measurements, no controls.
1) Believers say these recollections of past lives are very very common. But the same assertion can be made of people who claim to have seen a UFO or who have seen the tunnel of light in the alleged limbo between life and death. Must we also believe these claims because they occur frequently?
2)
The book that I choose to read on the subject are written by those with Phds, that have there academic careers at stake.
Oh there are many, many experts out there who would tell you anything you want to/ dread to hear. From how the damage by greenhouse gases have been exaggerated to scientific proof of God's design in nature. Their credibility should be determined by their arguments, and not solely by what precedes their first name.
INQ