as a jw i was always taught "never to get into debate or argue with householders.".
you know what is interesting about that?.
the message i had when i went to your door was essentially "hello, what ever your current belief is... is wrong.
I remember when we used to tell householders "We're not here to convert you." Now that's a bold-faced lie!
lol. Yeah "We're not here to throw you in a sack and bring you to the Kingdom Hall... not until next month's Kingdom Ministry recommends it."
-Sab
LOL They may be 'debators' but certainly are not very good debaters!
as a jw i was always taught "never to get into debate or argue with householders.".
you know what is interesting about that?.
the message i had when i went to your door was essentially "hello, what ever your current belief is... is wrong.
I remember when we used to tell householders "We're not here to convert you." Now that's a bold-faced lie!
as a jw i was always taught "never to get into debate or argue with householders.".
you know what is interesting about that?.
the message i had when i went to your door was essentially "hello, what ever your current belief is... is wrong.
Exactly, it shows the close-mindedness of the cult. JWs are there to show you (teach, not be taught) that you do not have the truth. They are not there to learn, or examine and find truth. The presmise is that their org is God's org and whatever they say that is authorized by the org is the truth.
according to jws, evolution is false.
so how do they explain these human-like fossils?.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/human_evolution.
LOL that is the word that came up when I googled it...like the word debator, falacial does not exist...
according to jws, evolution is false.
so how do they explain these human-like fossils?.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/human_evolution.
Please stop asking falacial questions.
I believe the word you're looking for is 'fallacious'. If the word 'falacial' actually existed, I think it would probably be related to an activity the GB has told you is perverted.
LOL I couldn't figure out what it meant either.
not sure if this was previously posted...but how many partakers were there this year?
thoughts on if they are headed to making this number symbolic while still stressing earthly hope?
or simply leaving it as a literal number and claiming both groups gathered concurrently throughout time?
Not sure if this was previously posted...but how many partakers were there this year? Thoughts on if they are headed to making this number symbolic while still stressing earthly hope? Or simply leaving it as a literal number and claiming both groups gathered concurrently throughout time?
i seem to have a bit of confusion concerning the purpose of this website and the people in it.
perhaps i am not computer savvy and do not understand some of the expressions used.
could someone comment and help clarify.. .
Green Jade, look around here and you will see a varied flavor of experiences and feel free to ask questions....I don't think you will see so much bias here as much as statements made frankly and from experience.
i seem to have a bit of confusion concerning the purpose of this website and the people in it.
perhaps i am not computer savvy and do not understand some of the expressions used.
could someone comment and help clarify.. .
Rebiaa/Debator, you still have not denied that you are Reniaa. Why not lie and deny it? You have already broken the org's rules by coming here. And you can ignore me, that's fine. You always ignore rebuttals of your nonsense anyway.
this is from the november 2010 kingdom ministry pages 5 and 6;.
it is a 20 minute item on how members of the congregation should assist unbelieving mates!.
http://www.box.net/shared/mzjkpiijgj.
I am sure that this will have many 'read between the lines' coming from the platform...regarding watching association and especially 'apostates'...the org is not lightening up. This is probably only to those who are considered moldable and convertible.
well then, i suppose as we are facing the 100th anniversay of jesus return in 1914, there sure must be the usual rumors going on in the cong.. for those in touch with jw: what have you heard so far?
is it a bit like pre-1975 with high expectations?.
Well, the SDA's have held onto 1844- once an important date (originally Christ's return)...which has now faded in importance but is considered the beginning of 'investigative judgment). 1914 will probably always be the time of the end...or perhaps remaining as just the end of the gentile times...a term that will fade in importance but always be held onto to keep the 1914 date and subsequent events intact.
