EdenOne: In your timeline, do you see anything - such as a technological breakthrough in separating blood fractions - that mirrors the change in the theological doctrine (or vice-versa)? I imagine there might be one. If that connection could be established, it would be one hell of a 'smoking gun'.
Absolutely. The trail of "medical breakthroughs" mirror the shifting stance of the WTS on blood fractions. And other technology that relates to the bloodless world.
I have found several historical medical studies that reveal what was being done to JW patients - procedures that would later get approval from the WTS, yet the studies would need cooperation from a recruiter to accomplish - which reveals that someone in the JWs knew the studies were being conducted. There are clinical trials designed specifically for JWs as the test group - the latest one got changed to a compassionate use program. This has often been the case - JWs are used to identify a need for drugs and procedures that don't meet FDA approval, yet can be distributed under the compassionate program.
It is how several drugs and procedures have made it to market - Fluosol-D 20% is one that used JWs as a testing group. The Japanese firm that manufactured it approached Dr. Ron Lapin back in the early 80s asking him to try it out on the JWs in the States who came to him for treatment. JWs were the first to use Flousol-DA 20 in the States. Fluosol-DA 20% was eventually taken off the market.
And, to bring it right up to date, the Hemopure that the HLC lovingly provide access to, is not an FDA approved product. The JW community is facilitating the product's use in the States by demanding compassionate use. The Society's approval of Hemopure mirrored the industry's need for a clinical trial group and, when that privilege was pulled by the FDA because of the risk factors being too high, the JWs keep it on the market through the FDA compassionate program.
The WTS and their JW bloodless men are all out there pushing their scare tactics directed towards the "risks of blood!!" yet they fail to mention that the risks of using Hemopure outweigh the risks of using allogenic blood transfusions.
According to studies of outcomes of transfusions given to trauma patients in 2008,[15] blood substitutes yielded a 30% increase in the risk of death and about a threefold increase in the chance of having a heart attack for the recipients. More than 3,711 patients were tested in sixteen studies using five types of artificial blood.[16] Public Citizen sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to attain information on the duration of these studies which were found to have been conducted from 1998 until 2007. The FDA permits artificial blood transfusions in the USA without informed consent under a special exemption from requirements of informed consent during traumatic care.
The artificial blood referred to in the last sentence is Polyheme - not approved by the WTS because it is made from human blood.