In UK law strangling a child at birth is murder - this was just my way of saying that Down Syndrome babies can be legally killed at birth.
Stop being obtuse.
there was a recent legal challenge, brought about by a woman who herself has down's, which sought to overturn this sad state of affairs.. and a few days ago, a judge upheld the original law and denied her legal challenge.
this is pretty sick, don't you think?.
pro-abortion people love to ridicule religious people who claim that life begins at conception, so the obvious question is, when does life actually begin?.
In UK law strangling a child at birth is murder - this was just my way of saying that Down Syndrome babies can be legally killed at birth.
Stop being obtuse.
quite bizarrely, there are people trying their level best to blur the lines between man and woman, male and female.. so, i thought it a fairly good idea to list the differences, on average, between men and women.. ok, starting with the most obvious .... women have a vulva, a vagina, and internal gonads (ovaries); men have a penis and external gonads (testes).. women get pregnant, give birth and breastfeed their babies; men do none of those things.. men are taller than women.. men have greater upper-body strength than women.
men have greater bone density and percentage of muscle mass than women.. women live longer than men (this is partly due to life choices and behaviour and partly due to genetics).. men have higher testosterone levels than women.. men heal more quickly from physical injury than women.. the sexual dynamics between men and women tend to be different, too.
re sexual selection, women typically have their choice of the most suitable men.
Quite bizarrely, there are people trying their level best to blur the lines between man and woman, male and female.
So, I thought it a fairly good idea to list the differences, on average, between men and women.
Ok, starting with the most obvious ...
Women have a vulva, a vagina, and internal gonads (ovaries); men have a penis and external gonads (testes).
Women get pregnant, give birth and breastfeed their babies; men do none of those things.
Men are taller than women.
Men have greater upper-body strength than women.
Men have greater bone density and percentage of muscle mass than women.
Women live longer than men (this is partly due to life choices and behaviour and partly due to genetics).
Men have higher testosterone levels than women.
Men heal more quickly from physical injury than women.
The sexual dynamics between men and women tend to be different, too. Re sexual selection, women typically have their choice of the most suitable men. Men are different, they tend to be desperate for sex and often f**k anything with a pulse, lol.
Behaviour is also a phenotype, and we find that men and women differ in terms of behaviour and life priorities/choices.
Men are more inclined towards high-risk/high reward behaviour whereas women tend more towards stability.
The tabla rasa* hypothesis is actually on pretty thin ice - some studies on newborn babies have shown that males tend to be more interested in things whereas newborn females tend to be more interested in people's faces.
Mean IQ for men and women is identical but women tend to be more clustered around the mean figure; men dominate the genius and retarded ends of the spectrum.
Feminists love to cherry-pick gender disparities in certain lucrative and/or high powered jobs such as boardroom executives, STEM jobs, football managers, etc., but the reality is that gender disparity is commonplace across a variety of jobs and employment sectors.
Here is a brief list of jobs/employment sectors where there are more men than women:
*************
And here is a brief list where there are more women than men:
There is also gender disparity in our jails - approx. 90% of inmates are men, 10% are women.
I can't think of any more differences at the moment but any additions and corrections to my list would be welcome.
*Tabla rasa - the idea that each newborn baby is a blank slate, onto which society writes its passions and prejudices.
there was a recent legal challenge, brought about by a woman who herself has down's, which sought to overturn this sad state of affairs.. and a few days ago, a judge upheld the original law and denied her legal challenge.
this is pretty sick, don't you think?.
pro-abortion people love to ridicule religious people who claim that life begins at conception, so the obvious question is, when does life actually begin?.
When you say state care it conjures up a picture of warehousing people and paying staff as little as possible - there are, of course, wrinkles to be ironed out in state care. But it's still better than strangling them at birth, which is what our current law allows.
there was a recent legal challenge, brought about by a woman who herself has down's, which sought to overturn this sad state of affairs.. and a few days ago, a judge upheld the original law and denied her legal challenge.
this is pretty sick, don't you think?.
pro-abortion people love to ridicule religious people who claim that life begins at conception, so the obvious question is, when does life actually begin?.
are you willing to adopt these kids then? - no, I'm not.
There are two options here:
#1. let them live, put them in state care, and use modern medicine to give them the best quality of life possible.
#2. kill them when they're foetuses at up to 9 months old.
And you're going for #2?
there was a recent legal challenge, brought about by a woman who herself has down's, which sought to overturn this sad state of affairs.. and a few days ago, a judge upheld the original law and denied her legal challenge.
this is pretty sick, don't you think?.
pro-abortion people love to ridicule religious people who claim that life begins at conception, so the obvious question is, when does life actually begin?.
There was a recent legal challenge, brought about by a woman who herself has Down's, which sought to overturn this sad state of affairs.
And a few days ago, a judge upheld the original law and denied her legal challenge.
This is pretty sick, don't you think?
Pro-abortion people love to ridicule religious people who claim that life begins at conception, so the obvious question is, when does life actually begin?
Some more questions:
Aren't 9 month old Down's Syndrome babies considered to be persons and alive?
Don't they have rights?
Who will protect them and stand up for them?
Isn't the current state of affairs a form of apartheid?
I'm seriously thinking of writing to my local MP about this. She has a legal background, I think.
just to put it out there, the whole gender pronouns idea being pushed by the lgbtq+ minorities is just a way to try to hide the sin of homosexuality.
if you can void people talking about your true sexual identity then it seems there is no sin anymore if two they or them of the same sex are together.
example of the coverup: ("i don't identify as either gender"), so the kids i'm raising in a lesbian relationship need not speak of me as a mom or any other female term and we all don't have to feel any stigma attached to the true terms so, any shame we might feel is hidden anyway.
fundamentalists find it easier accepting they've raised a girl who should have been a boy - indeed is really a boy - than to admit their daughter is a lesbian - yes, this is very worrying because there is a pressure from some parents and other trans activists to put gay kids forward for gender transition.
In the UK, a court of appeal has recently overturned a ban on minors having gender transition treatment. This is bad news for all types of kids, but gay kids especially.
I expect an avalanche of lawsuits further down the road because of this.
'Trans' doesn't really sit well with 'gay' or 'women', and it seems we're gonna find this out the hard way.
i have a science background but am fairly new to film critics and what they talk about.
in science, references are used to support statements, introduce some ideas that other scientists may propose, etc.
they have a purpose.
I have a science background but am fairly new to film critics and what they talk about.
In science, references are used to support statements, introduce some ideas that other scientists may propose, etc. They have a purpose. So, you can kinda imagine my reaction when I first came across references in movies a few years ago.
I remember one youtube film critic talking about a scene in New Nightmare (1994) and how it 'referenced' Nosferatu (1921). Basically, a scene in which Freddy comes out of a bed and stalks across a bedroom, throwing his silhouette on the wall reminded him of the Count Orlok's silhouette. Er, and that's it. I remember asking myself at the time, what purpose do film references serve?
And I still haven't found the answer, lol. One issue here is that film references and themes are a bit like seeing shapes in clouds or looking at a map of Australia and Tasmania and seeing a rabbit eating an apple. You see what you wanna see.
E.g. another youtuber claims that The Hills Have Eyes (1977) gives a commentary on the Vietnam War. After I'd stopped laughing, I thought, Does it? If it does, it's an extremely shallow commentary. XD
Critics even see themes that the director of a film hadn't intended. A great example of this is The Fly (1986) - some critics saw Seth Brundle's physical degeneration as an allegory for AIDS. Director David Cronenberg has patiently explained that this was never his intention but I'm not sure all the critics have taken his comments on board.
Of course, not all youtubers or other film critics waffle on about references or themes, some concentrate on the functional elements of a film - writing, plot, dialogue, acting, effects, etc.
Thoughts?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc_w9vtzj0a&ab_channel=livingwaters.
@Sea Breeze - just because four top professors do a poor job of explaining evolution, it doesn't mean evolution is incorrect.
The evidence for evolution is plentiful.
.. so said one of the comments on the latest video from nate the lawyer:.
https://youtu.be/_f_sehu3674.
it is an interesting case of why "equal pay" isn't quite what you think it is.
Football is driven by the market.
And Cristiano Ronaldo or Leo Messi sell a f**k-ton more shirts than some purple-haired lesbian does.
That's the cold, hard truth.
this is the latest problem in north american society.
mating inequality.
there are now more women college graduates than men in the us.
I see a lot of spinsters and single moms in the future as well - yeah, this is a result of the destructiveness and negativity of feminist ideology.
A lot of feminists hate men, specifically straight white men.
Yeah, there'll be a fair few crazy cat-ladies thanks to this malicious feminist doctrine.