OneEyedJoe

Joined

• started 34 topics
• posted 2,930 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by OneEyedJoe

• 
  72

  Single Sisters Over A Certain Age Group Getting A Bad Rap

  by HiddlesWife in

  1. social
  2. relationships

  i'm new here; one of my relatives was a member on this forum a few years ago and told me about it.

  anyways, as a sister who has been in the org since childhood and now in her late 40's (plus as a woman of color), i have noticed that a number of brothers have an ageist attitude.

  they are very accepting of young women under 26 and rejecting women over that age, particularly those in their 30's and over.. is this an unspoken mindset from wthq (specifically from bethel), or is it that quite a number of males (sorry, i'm not sexist here) have this type of mentality?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  It's probably not coming from watchtower specifically but any time you put yourself in a male-dominant authoritarian cult, you're probably going to find that women are viewed more as a commodity than for the person that they are (especially since they're not really allowed to express who they are and are instead required to be subservient) which will tend to favor younger women.

  The watchtower's version of "spirituality" is nothing more than a gauge of your level of devotion to the watchtower organization. It has nothing to do with god. Get out of the cult, figure out who you really are and then figure out what (or if) religion is right for you.
• 
  25

  Song 151

  by ab.ortega in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  any idea what could have happened to song 151?

  what logical reason could they have had to skip a number.

  is the number 151 now an evil number accordig to new light?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Maybe they just didn't count correctly. They have, after all, demonstrated time and again that they're not super great with numbers:

  607 vs 587

  How long is a year? 360 days or 365.25?

  The whole zero-year debacle.

  1+1=1 (with generations, at least)

  etc. etc.
• 
  12

  Mass baptism nullification 10/2/16 #unJW

  by rebel8 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i thought i would rework this and try it again.

  i found an old baptism nullification letter here written by poster balsam, and revised it a bit.. i really think we should do a large-scale baptismal nullification request.

  letter and more info here.. i am concerned there is no way to track how many people did it.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  If the timing works out I'll join in. I figure it's probably best to wait until my divorce is final to DA.
• 
  8

  Disfellowshipping - What It's Supposed To Be

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  first of all, the wt tell this lie to the rank and file:.

  two factors—which must coincide—result in the disfellowshipping of one of jehovah’s witnesses.

  first, a baptized witness commits a serious sin.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Well said. Clear and concise explanation of why the JW practice is not biblical. I would also say that, near as I can tell, Paul's instructions were meant to go to the congregation as a whole, not to the "elders" or those leading the congregation. Each one was meant to make their own judgement about who they mixed in company with, and someone else's association was never listed as something to take into account when deciding if they were to continue on as a brother in the congregation. Therefore the practice of having elders decide who is disfellowshipped is clearly going beyond the scriptures, as is the practice of disfellowshipping someone for their failure to shun.
• 
  9

  The Watchtower Society's Purpose

  by compound complex in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  "the sole purpose of our existence as a society is to announce the kingdom established in 1914 and to sound the warning of the fall of babylon the great [in 1918].

  we have a special message to deliver.

  "--- fred franz's words to bethel family, november 17, 1979..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  He needed one of those radio announcers to come in behind him:

  "Subject to change without notice. All rights reserved. Not responsible for any commitments you make based on our doctrine."
• 
  24

  Do you think any animals will ever reach human intelligence?

  by EndofMysteries in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  if all life was truly random, then what happened that allowed humans to it's current intelligent state, do you think non humans could and will reach that in the future?

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  Other animals will reach human intelligence if there's sustained evolutionary pressure to that end. If smarter animals have a greater chance of reproduction, then the population will evolve to become smarter. There are some hurdles, though. About a quarter of the energy used by our bodies is consumed by our brain. Think of that - the brain is roughly 1-2% of our weight and consumes 25% of our energy. That's a HUGE penalty to overcome if food is scarce or if conservation of body heat is important. That immediately reduces the area of the planet where intelligent life is likely to evolve by a large factor.

  In the history of evolution, things like vision, flight, echolocation, opposable thumbs, and many other features have evolved multiple times along distinct lineages. Human levels of intelligence, though, has only evolved once. This indicates that it probably requires some pretty specific circumstances to develop. It is also possible that having one species with high intelligence dominating the planet (humans) will in some way prevent another species from developing similar intelligence. It may be that intelligence fills a niche that once full prevents other species from being able to successfully exploit the advantages of intelligence without being overwhelmed by the disadvantage of having to support a large brain.

  Of course primates are the most likely animals to evolve intelligence, but since they share a pretty recent ancestor with us that's not a very interesting case. Dolphins have a shot, perhaps, but I think that's probably fairly unlikely due to a lack of flexibility in their bodies - they are much more limited than primates in their ability to manipulate their environment (though there are some indications that they've learned to use tools to catch food without human influence) so I think their ability to take advantage of increased intelligence is limited. Some birds are very intelligent as well, but I suspect evolutionary pressure will force them as a species to maintain the ability to fly in most cases where intelligence might be selected for - so the increased brain mass would come with a great penalty that might not be something that could be overcome. Obviously there are flightless birds, but they've evolved largely in environments that offer other obstacles to the evolution of a large brain.

  In any event, evolution has proven itself capable of creating some pretty surprising things, so who knows what'll happen.
• 
  7

  My Freedom as an "Apostate"

  by TheLiberator in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  just curious.

  how many of you are "apostates", but not disfellowshipped?

  i know this happens if you keep this stuff secret.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  I don't really have any interaction with JWs any more at this point, but I've been pretty open with a couple people about my apostasy and nothing's been done. I don't have much of a social network, though, so my influence isn't nearly what yours has been so I'm probably not seen as much of a threat. Also my father-in-law is an elder in my former congregation and told my wife repeatedly that thinking it's a cult isn't grounds for disfellowshipping. Not sure where he got that, but I think he's prevented action from being taken for her sake and probably doesn't want to be seen as flip-flopping on that.
• 
  22

  How To Spot A Cult - This is what started woke me up!!

  by pale.emperor in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this is the article that woke me up.

  i felt sick after reading it.

  then sad.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  It's a good list, but I think it's missing one important thing - loaded language.

  I don't remember where I read it (probably some reference to lifton's work) but when I was in my early teens I got a little tidbit about how cults use loaded language wherein words have different definitions for cultists than they do for society at large. I think that was a very large part of the foundation that my awakening was built on because I often had moments of clarity where I'd recognize that JWs used loaded language extensively. Especially when speakers would talk about why it's kingdom hall vs church or meetings vs mass. Once I recall a guy giving a talk went so far as to explain that we have to be mindful of how we sound when talking to worldly people because if we tell someone we were "out in the field" all day they'll think we're crazy, or if we say we were "in service" they'll think we were in the military, etc. I think he gave 5 or 6 examples and sitting there listening to all the loaded language rattled off and highlighted like that made me deeply uncomfortable. It was something that I never forgot and would often think back to when doubts would come up.
• 
  22

  Song 146 - You did it for me

  by Listener in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the watchtower 1970 4/1 emphasis the principle that singing at the kingdom hall is part of worship to god and is one of the most beautiful ways they can show this worship to him.. of all the ways in which we can worship and praise jehovah god—by prayer, by public talks, by our field ministry and by our exemplary conduct—one of the most beautiful of them is this literal singing of songs to jehovah’s praise....and, above all, let us pay more than usual attention to the words.

  it is by the words that we worship jehovah god, bringing praise to him.

  as an introduction to song 146, jw org states -jesus considers any act of love and support for his anointed brothers as though it were done for him.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  these songs are simply infantile
  

  Yeah, I was really bummed when they gave us the new song book. I really miss the song about beating off bees that had been molested.
• 
  51

  Why are anniversaries allowed but not birthdays?

  by hyperpen in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the scripture quotes aside, i was always told that we don't celebrate birthdays because that is a celebration of the self, which has no place in jehovah's organization.

  then why celebrate anniversaries?

  anniversary celebrations are about the joining of two selves, isn't that twice as selfish?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  OneEyedJoe

  I personally believe birthdays are not allowed because it's a cult and cults need members to avoid mixing with "worldly" people. This of course does not apply to anniversaries.
  

  This. Birthdays are a threat to the invisible walls that are built up separating JWs from normal people in two ways that anniversary celebrations aren't. The first, and probably most important, is that children have birthdays - their growth depends in large part on turning JW children into adult members so it's important that they keep the children segregated from normal people in order to properly indoctrinate the phobias of the outside and prevent them from developing a support system outside the cult that they could potentially turn to when they have doubts. Second, birthdays are often recognized by normal people at work or in school, etc. Anniversaries are typically ignored unless you're close friends with someone. Again, it's about separating JWs from normal society.

  That doesn't really answer the spirit of the question, though. But there are so many double standards - so many things are forbidden on the basis of pagan origins but neckties and wedding rings aren't a problem. Tattoos are bad but shaving is good. etc. etc. They'll always just ignore the contrast because when you look at it closely you realize that it's ridiculous. In most cases, too, it comes down to whether they can effectively use the rule to either reduce individuality (i.e. no tattoos and all men must shave) or reduce exposure to normal people (birthdays, holidays, etc). Forbidding an anniversary party doesn't really do either of those very well. Same goes for wedding rings. They're fine because not wearing a wedding ring isn't going to separate you from normal people and there's not much individuality expressed there in most cases.

  There would also be some risk to them in forbidding anniversaries. Since many couples celebrate privately with a nice dinner or something this could generate a place where some "weak" JWs would rebel and perhaps realize that the cult was overly controlling. This is particularly a problem because this rebellion would be two people together, which could result in their discussing it and thinking about it together which would increase the odds that they discuss other issues that they have with the cult.