ithinkisee
Don't worry, snide comments on hold. I was once where you are.
Without getting too deep how does a Christian deal with the hypocrisy of many Christian leaders (Pat Robertson comes to mind ... lol). Do I just remind my wife that it is a personal relationship with Jesus and that these guys are basically crazy?
Yes, it is that simple. Christian is a label, just like plumber or doctor. You have plumbers who are good, and doctors who are good. You also have doctors and plumbers who are incompetent, bigotted, sloppy and dishonest.
Read James, it's all about not judging other individuals. People should worry about how they are doing and not about finger pointing at bad examples who any reasonable person would see as not being representative.
On that note, how would I answer regarding war, and politics, and so forth - when the Scriptures do seem to point to unfavorable alliances between religion and government - or am I still thinking too much like a JW and reading too much into "Babylon The Great's" fornication with government?
You are assuming that the scriptual interpretation you have been using is better than the half dozen you can find on 'any street corner'. You have been in what is broadly described as an adventist movement - one that basically says 'the end is coming', and uses all sorts of scriptual 'proofs' to back up their argument.
Obviously you are well aware that JW's along with other adventist faiths who have made date-specific prophecies, have all, every single one, been wrong. Statistically speaking if one says there have been 1,000 predictions based upon the Bible of the world ending, none of which have been right, then the chance a prediction for a future date based upon the saem level of proof is 0 divided by 1,000; or zero.
Attempts to link current governments, or crime, or 'young people nowadays' to supposed prophecies concerning the end-of-the-world are just the 'back story' used to flesh-out the end-of-the-world prophecy.
Look at the rubbish over earthquakes that Witnesses spout, or the now-forgotten applications of 'King of the North' and 'King of the South' to the cold war.
Any faith that means people will not get involved and do what they can (even if this is just being informed about world affairs and voting accordingly), is one where people actually turn their back on their fellow man on the basis of an unsubstansiatable prophecy that, on the basis of those that went before it, is just as likely to be a failure due to it being based upon man's vanity (of knowing what god thinks) rather than an actual message about the world ending in the Bible.
Thus adventist, isolationist religions actually fail in a very noticable fashion when it comes to showing love to their neighbour.
In the afterlife, apparently we get looked after. We have to look after each other in this life.
Do I sound completely retarded?