Read Barbara Anderson v. Watchtower Court Documents

by AndersonsInfo 20 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • ithinkisee
    ithinkisee

    The encouraging thing about these documents now that I finally got to read them (almost) in their entirety is that the Society always hides behind their first amendment rights (of this wicked Anglo-American world power coincidentally) of freedom of religion and how the courts have no right.

    I like how Ms. Anderson's docs state that they have no problem with the disfellowshipping in general and do not wish to contest it - but that this is a non-religious matter.

    Man, I would love to know what fake charges the Society fed the local elders against the Andersons for the second judicial hearing ... is that in a thread somewhere?

    -ithinkisee

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    Ithink,

    Here is the document that answers your question:

    http://www.silentlambs.org/assistance/andersonscom6-2-03.htm

    53. Jehovah 's Witnesses officials in New York sent similar letters to the local elders of the congregations in which the other participants on the Dateline program belonged. On information and belief, this hasty attempt to charge, try, and disfellowship Ms. Anderson and the other Dateline participants prior to the Dateline program was part of a scheme devised by the Defendants to keep members of the Jehovah's Witnesses who watched the program from believing any statements she made on the program that were disfavorable to the Jehovah's Witnesses.

    54. Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson learned of the letter on May 2, 2002 at the meeting of the local elders. Lawrence Seely, the Presiding Overseer of the Manchester Congregation, directed Mr. Anderson to notify Ms. Anderson to appear on May 10, 2002 before a judicial committee that would try her on the apostasy charge.

    55. On information and belief, between May 6 and 11, 2002 Defendant J.R. Brown, a national spokesman for the Jehovah's Witnesses, made comments to the media (which the media published) that several Jehovah's Witnesses members were to be summoned and tried on charges of having committed various spiritual violations for the purpose of determining whether they should be disfellowshipped for committing spiritual violations. He also advised a reporter from the Washington Post that the proceedings would focus on sins unrelated to public comments made on Dateline concerning sexual abuse. Brown?s comments were reported in various media.

    56. A number of Jehovah's Witnesses in Tennessee and New York who were aware of Ms. Anderson?s planned appearance on Dateline read or heard of these comments understood that Brown was referring to her as one of the persons charged with spiritual violations in general and with spiritual violations unrelated to the comments she planned to make on Dateline .

    57. On May 10, 2002 the judicial committee hearing was held on the charges of submitting an article to an apostate journal and on causing division in the church. Ms. Anderson attended the hearing and proved to the satisfaction of committee members that she had not submitted an article to apostate journal and that she had not caused division in the church.

    58. Rebuffed in their scheme to disfellowship Ms. Anderson, the Defendants in furtherance of their fraudulent scheme concocted new charges against her. On May 17, 2002 Presiding Overseer, Larry Seely contacted Ms. Anderson and told that her that she had been charged with (1) d isrupting the unity of the congregation and (2) undermining confidence in Jehovah's arrangements. He asked her to attend another judicial hearing to be convened two days later. On information and belief, the corporate Defendants directed Mr. Seely to take these steps.

    59. Recognizing that the charges were a sham intended to silence her, Ms. Anderson declined to attend the hearing. On information and belief, the local elders held the May 19, 2002 hearing and purported to find her guilty of causing divisions in the church. They ordered that she be disfellowshipped from the church.

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    These are the worst counts IMO against the WT:

    http://www.silentlambs.org/assistance/andersonscom6-2-03.htm

    COUNT SIX

    (Fraud)

    122. The Plaintiffs reassert and reallege paragraphs 1-69 and further allege as follows:

    123. That, on information and belief, the Defendants on or about April or May of 2002 formulated a fraudulent and malicious plan designed to use their otherwise legitimate right to disfellowship members to destroy the credibility of Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson prior to her Dateline appearance, so as to frustrate her efforts to assist victims of child sexual abuse and to prevent the church from sheltering child abusers.

    124. That, the Defendants, acting individually, as agents for the other Defendants, and as part of their conspiracy, intentionally represented to members of the Jehovah's Witnesses committees considering whether to disfellowship the Plaintiffs, to the members of the Manchester congregation, and to inquiring members of the media that the Plaintiffs had committed spiritual violations that justified their expulsion from the faith;

    125. That the Defendants concealed from the members of the Jehovah's Witnesses committees considering whether to disfellowship the Plaintiffs, to the members of the Manchester congregation, and to inquiring members of the media that Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson had not committed any spiritual violations;

    126. That the Defendants knew that these representations were untrue, that the facts concealed were material, and that the Plaintiff had not committed any spiritual violation that would justify disfellowshipping;

    127. That those members of the tribunals who were not a part of the fraudulent and malicious plan reasonably relied on these false representations and voted to disfellowship Plaintiffs;

    128. That the Plaintiffs were disfellowshipped as a result of the Defendant?s fraudulent misrepresentations and concealment of material facts;

    129. That Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson suffered damage in the form of great emotional distress and out of pocket fees paid to her attorney to represent her in the disfellowshipping proceedings as a result of the Defendants? fraud; that Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson suffered damage in the form of great emotional distress and loss of profits from his business as a result of the Defendants? fraud;

    WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court:

    (a) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (b) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00);

    (c) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (d) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00); and

    (e) To award Plaintiffs any other relief to which they may be entitled.

    COUNT SEVEN

    (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

    130. The Plaintiffs reassert and reallege paragraphs 1-69 and further allege as follows:

    131. That, in using their otherwise legitimate right to disfellowship members to silence the Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson?s efforts to assist victims of child sexual abuse and to prevent the church from sheltering child abusers, the Defendants, acting individually, as agents for the other Defendants, and as part of their conspiracy, the Defendants at all times acted intentionally or recklessly;

    132. That their conduct was so outrageous that it should not be tolerated by a civilized society;

    133. That the conduct caused serious emotional distress to both Plaintiffs;

    WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court:

    (a) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (b) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00);

    (c) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (d) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00);and

    (e) To award Plaintiffs any other relief to which they may be entitled.

    COUNT EIGHT

    (Wrongful Disfellowshipping)

    134. The Plaintiffs reassert and reallege paragraphs 1-69 and further allege as follows:

    135. That, prior to the summer of 2002, Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson and Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson were both members and participants of the Jehovah's Witnesses and devout believers in the faith of this religion;

    136. That the Defendants, acting individually, as agents for the other Defendants, and as part of their conspiracy, disfellowshipped both Plaintiffs

    137. That the Defendants disfellowshipped both Plaintiffs for purely secular purposes and as part of their intentional, fraudulent and malicious effort to silence the Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson?s efforts to assist victims of child sexual abuse and to prevent the church from sheltering child abusers;

    138. That the Defendants? use of their otherwise legitimate right to disfellowship members to silence Ms. Anderson?s efforts to assist victims of child sexual abuse and to prevent the church from sheltering child abusers and to punish both Plaintiffs violates important public policies of the State of Tennessee designed to permit the free exercise of religion and those policies designed to prevent the sexual abuse of children and the reporting of said abuse;

    139. That the wrongful disfellowshipping of both Plaintiffs caused each Plaintiff to suffer damages including emotional harm, damage to reputation, and out of pocket losses.

    WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs respectfully request the Court:

    (a) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (b) To award Plaintiff Barbara J. Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00);

    (c) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson compensatory damages in the amount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00);

    (d) To award Plaintiff A. Joseph Anderson punitive damages in the amount of Six Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($6,500,000.00); and

    (e) To award Plaintiffs any other relief to which they may be entitled.

    Respectfully submitted,

  • Mulan
    Mulan

    Wow! That should cool their jets for awhile. Good job everyone.

  • johnny cip
    johnny cip

    1. i've been reading this case on silentlambs. i think were the wt loses out is the point made about the difference of the 1st ammendment right to beleive anything you want and the right to act on your beliefs. as if acting out to hurt the public in general. based on your beliefs. some of what i'm reading is a little gray. as i'm not a lawyer. but i'm sure any jury of 12 americans. can understand the common sense of keeping a church .from hiding dangrous, or criminal activity under the sepration of church and state. it seems the churches have build up a legal , way to skirt the laws over the years. just remember what was gained under good or bad pretenses. can be be removed or curtailed. as need be by public outcry. or just just simple common sense. look what has been happening in france in the last 10 yrs. over 100 so called churches including the wt have lost some of thier rights. as an honest religion. based on some of their activities. A SCAM ONLY LASTS AS LONG AS THE SCAMMER CAN CON THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND THE STATE. there allways come a point in time when the scammer has to answer. the wt may not fall but in the next 20 years . they will be taken to the laundry and cleasned to an extent... john
  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    If this thing finally goes to a trial which it seem very likely it will. Who can be called to the stand to be examined under oath? Can members of the GB be called on to testify?????? Member of the Legal department, the Service department, and Writting too??? This could be very very bad for the GB if they ever had to be before a jury to testify!!!!

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    This would be so so so damaging if an investigation into Governing Body authority structure is conducted,, what hypocrisy this would expose, it would be so damming, that it might even make world news!!!!Dateline for sure!!!!

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin

    I could just imagine the title of a Dateline special with,, first reshowing of the previous child abuse and the WT, Dateline epesode, then the next week Dateline gives a national view of the testimony of the leaders of the Cult. What would the title be for that episode??Since Dateline is very aware of the danger that these whistleblowers were in they may be very eager to do a follow up and show how the WT got beaten badly in court over this.

  • frankiespeakin
    frankiespeakin


    Barb & Joe,

    I bet if the elders that DF you, if they were sued in court, and lost, they would sing like a canary in court just to get back at the WT.

  • patio34
    patio34

    Thanks Barb & Joe---I'm printing it out to understand it better. It's odd, but I still highlight stuff for understanding, lol. I admire your perseverance and energy to get justice!

    Thanks Frankiespeakin for the summation and portions.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit