Frankie, I agree with you re: GJohn. But how do you think this affects the present topic?
I think the present topic was brought up because someone really believes these were jesus's actual words and so has faith in them because they actually beleive they were jesus authentic words.
That being the case I thought i would add this so they will not worry about these words and their application since these gospels clearly are not his word in any shape or form.. and that they are just cleverly thought out words from a dishonest source.
And I think it is very interesting and that we should remember many scholars agree that the GJ is high on the list as far as clearly evidence redaction.