That’s a list of source types, basically in order of least reliable to most reliable, not a methodology. Thought I’d move WT publications to the top of the list and theses above chronological works.
How to debunk the 1914 calculus ONLY using JW publications?
by psyco 208 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
TD
The said scholar is big on grammar and he has read the verses grammatically in line with sound exegesis.
I'd kinda like to hear a grammatical argument if such can be framed.
Assuming a preferred understanding is the only grammatically possible understanding is exactly how critics of the NWT get themselves into trouble.
-
Fisherman
only grammatically possible understanding.
What do you mean by that?
-
scholar
TD
I'd kinda like to hear a grammatical argument if such can be framed.
Assuming a preferred understanding is the only grammatically possible understanding is exactly how critics of the NWT get themselves into trouble.
---
Another word for gobblydook
scholar JW
-
Disillusioned JW
Hi scholar. I appreciate that you appreciate the way I made use of Bible commentaries.
-
scholar
Disilluisoned JW
I appreciate that you appreciate the way I made use of Bible commentaries.
--
Keep it up and you find the Commentary on the Old Testament by Keil and Delitschz most valuable.
scholar JW
-
Fisherman
Another word for gobblydook
That is what I originally intended to post.
-
Fisherman
Has anyone here ever hear of Barry Horowitz?
-
Sanchy
Scholar: The said scholar is big on grammar and he has read the verses grammatically in line with sound exegesis.
>"sound exegesis"
Lmfao!
-
scholar
Sanchy
Scholar is big on grammar and big on exegesis but not so big on eisegesis.
scholar JW