Oct 2018 study WT trying to whitewash and change what happened on Rutherfords takeoever

by Bad_Wolf 10 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Bad_Wolf
    Bad_Wolf

    Check out the oct 2018 Wt study on 100 years since 1918.

    "At this meeting, held on January 5, 1918, several prominent men who had been dismissed from Bethel attempted to gain control of the organization. Richard H. Barber, a faithful traveling overseer, opened the meeting with prayer. After a report on the preceding year’s work, the annual election of directors was held. Brother Barber nominated Joseph Rutherford and six other brothers. Then an attorney who sided with the opposers nominated seven other men, including the ones who had been dismissed from Bethel. They were defeated. By an overwhelming majority, the shareholders elected Brother Rutherford and six other faithful brothers to be directors." - nothing here about how Rutherford got elected as a neutral option since he was new, and expected to be obeyed and have absolute control when Franz wanted power shared, and rutherford kicked them out then elected his own puppet replacements.

    And I like this oxymoron in the article too, "E. F. Crist, a traveling overseer in Canada, told of a couple who had read The Finished Mystery and accepted the truth in only five weeks". What in "the finished mystery" is still accepted as 'truth' by the WT?

    The rest of the article gives cherry picked details of how Rutherford gets jailed, then it ends. No details of how and why they got released.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    I have long thought that the manner Rutherford's death - butt cancer - was entirely deserved.

    What a shitty excuse for a human being.

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Did they have a footnote about CTR’s well documented and legal wishes concerning the WTBTS after his death??

    DD🤔

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    Great post! Thanks for sharing this.

    It is indeed yet another example of "white washing" and "re-writing" of JW history!

    Makes me so angry to see how brazen the GB are in producing such material!

    Any organization that is so embarrassed about its past and seeks to cover it over, is not an honest one.

  • steve2
    steve2

    Nothing quite like the organization's sanitized account of history which is so contrary to what actually happened.

  • Beth Sarim
    Beth Sarim

    stuckinarut2

    ''Great post! Thanks for sharing this.

    It is indeed yet another example of "white washing" and "re-writing" of JW history!

    Makes me so angry to see how brazen the GB are in producing such material!

    Any organization that is so embarrassed about its past and seeks to cover it over, is not an honest one.''

    The David and Vivian Aspinal videos share your sentiment. David relates also to how the Daniel book released in 1999 was changed to what was studied in the 1970s.

    He relates also how it kind of "angers" him on how what he believed once is now changed to fit the Borgs agenda.

    The David and Vivian Aspinal youtube videos. Nice vids, really well done. Very coy, stoic but informative.

  • smiddy3
    smiddy3

    Any organization that is so embarrassed about its past and seeks to cover it over, is not an honest one.

    Ain`t that the truth.

    It is indeed yet another example of "white washing" and "re-writing" of JW history!

    They have no shame lying bastards that they are.


  • Beth Sarim
    Beth Sarim

    Smiddy

    ''Any organization that is so embarrassed about its past and seeks to cover it over, is not an honest one.

    Ain`t that the truth.

    It is indeed yet another example of "white washing" and "re-writing" of JW history!

    They have no shame lying bastards that they are.''

    Some people just cannot see the 'forest through the trees'.

    Perhaps its just because they are toooooooo heavily and emotionally invested into 'it'. Some Dubs after investing 5 or 6 decades just can no way accept anything else. There is just NO WAY they can think maybe they were duped or hoodwinked.

  • Bobcat
    Bobcat

    Does anyone have a link to a thread here that has a good recount or synopsis of what really happened?

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot
    stuckinarut2 - "...Any organization that is so embarrassed about its past and seeks to cover it over is not an honest one..."

    Yup.

    Once again, for the newbies, lurkers, and trolls...

    ...if you have to cheat to defend your beliefs, your beliefs don't deserve to be defended.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit