Both!
On this site I only deal with one issue. Which is the deception in the Sept. 1 1987 Wt. article "A Time to speak When?" with regard to the "witness" in par. 6 " where the 'witness' has a responsibility to come forth with testimony when a "adjuration" is put forth when there is a trial going on in the Jewish court.
Yet in par.7 it states "put the responsibility upon each Israelite to report to the judges any serious wrongdoing that he observed so that the matter might be handled."
This article was written in 1987! It was in 1984 when the church started the "obedience to the organization mantra" necessitated by the demise of 1975 and the oracle F. Franz inability to come up with a line of BS to continue the cornerstone concept of Matt.24:34. The church conspired to shut down minds as the works of F. Franz was fiction the same as Ron L Hubbard. Since 1975 there has not been real "new light" as there was during the 1960's! Unless you want to count "Splain"s insight on Matt.24:34.
The article "A Time to speak When?" in reality was the fabrication of a hunting license to ferret out the brand new emerging enemy "the apostate"! It was this time period that this new enemy appeared. Prior to 1975 the enemy was "Satan". This is part of a conspiracy to control minds in that there was no new oracle to come up with a line of BS with regard to Matt.24:34! So if the church could not offer "spiritual food" to explain the "delay of the master" then the "slave" turned evil and conspired to shut down minds and control dissent by means of destroying families by shunning. This article instituted a "Gestapo informant policy" of which is not in the Bible. Hence the necessity to twist the "witness" who has the responsibility to bring forth testimony when a "call to testify" is put forth in a courtroom setting. And turn the witness into a SNITCH!
You got a problem with that, Google commentary on Lev.5:1 go to Bible Hub and there will be opened up to you a fascinating study on Jewish court procedure. I will send a $100.00 check to the first person who is sharp enough to locate in that material where it is a "crime victim" putting fort the "adjuration" or "call to testify" and not a magistrate/judge.
2013 two things happened I got put in the Human Apostate" talk for writing letters to the publishers homes. The church revised their Bible and completely revised Lev.5:1. To this day the church has kept the "new light" of that revision cloaked in silence! Why? Because to understand the true meaning of Lev.5:1 is to understand the deception in the 1987 Wt. article "A Time to Speak When?"! The importance is NOT that there was a deception perpetrated but how this deception relates to the 'blood transfusion policy"
So the question is; What is the moral, ethical, legal requirement that a church has to be transparent to its adherents that it uses deception to formulate official and enforceable policy, when at the same time they have an official and enforceable policy requiring the forfeiture of human life?
The issue I am dealing with is to prove that the church is guilty of murder with innocent women, children! Will my efforts in putting this line of reasoning to various agencies come to fruition time will tell. I haven't had any response. If my efforts are successful and some agency takes issue with the murder on innocents I will have publicly humiliated the Governing Body to the point that their alcoholic soaked hearts will not be able to handle the humiliation of being caught in their own deception as contained in the article "A Time to Speak When?"!
I have literally ended the life of one elder so is it vengeance or payback to do the same to the Governing Body? They took my family I will take their lives! You might want to read my initial post.
You need to read Barbara Andersons essay "Flawed Decree Conceals Criminals". She got the history right but she was not wanting to listen as to the reason the church was cloaking the RNWT revision in silence, she only saw her own agenda as to applying it to molestation's. Randal Waters had a problem with Barbara, I got the same problem. It seems Randal Waters had his posts removed from this site, will I meet the same fate?
Hey Satan here is a "pearl" see what you can do to rip it apart Matt.7:6
