Praise Jehovah God, Jehovah's Witnesses are not part of 'The Disinformation Dozen'

by was a new boy 15 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • slimboyfat
    slimboyfat

    I follow Chris Martensen, John Campbell and Bret Weinstein on YouTube. I don’t agree with everything they say but these are the facts.

    Martensen and Campbell said this would be a significant pandemic in January and February 2020 when the WHO still said it could be contained.

    Martensen and Campbell were calling for flights to be stopped in 2020 when the WHO and governments were saying that was disproportionate and would harm the economy.

    Martensen and Campbell said the virus was clearly airborne in March 2020 when the WHO still said there was no evidence for that.

    Martensen, Campbell and Weinstein said that masks could reduce your risk of catching the virus while Fauci was actively discouraging the public from using masks, and the UK government even suggested masks could be counterproductive.

    When the UK government unveiled its “herd immunity” strategy of just letting everyone catch the virus Campbell and Martensen said that was nuts. The UK government backtracked and claimed they never promoted that strategy at all.

    Martensen and Weinstein said the evidence pointed to a lab leak over a year ago while the government was labelling it a conspiracy theory and Facebook and YouTube were banning people who presented the evidence for a lab leak.

    Martensen, Weinstein and Campbell all argue there is good evidence that Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for the virus. Many academic studies support this conclusion yet it is still being censored on YouTube, Facebook and so on.

    Martensen and Weinstein argue that the vaccines may not be as safe as governments and pharmaceutical companies claim and that mass vaccination may be a short term fix but a bigger problem in the long run as they promote mutations and may have long term health consequences.

    Governments, and their online henchmen, the owners of social media platforms, claim this is “false information”, but with a track record as poor as theirs, who would put their money on government agencies and social media controllers being right this time? At the very least it needs open discussion. Discussing whether Ivermectin may be an effective treatment and whether vaccines may have serious problems is the sensible way to proceed, but some would deny us even the chance to discuss it.

    It’s a bizarre situation when an ordinary google search lists page after page of media proclamations that Ivermectin is a “fake cure” for Covid19, whereas a google scholar search lists pages of results in academic journals indicating Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for Covid19.

  • pistolpete
    pistolpete

    it’s a bizarre situation when an ordinary google search lists page after page of media proclamations that Ivermectin is a “fake cure” for Covid19, whereas a google scholar search lists pages of results in academic journals indicating Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for Covid19.

    That's because "Ordinary" google "SEARCHERS" ----TRUST THESE GUYS -----MORE---than pages of academic journals.

    https://sm.mashable.com/t/mashable_me/fun/m/mark-zucke/mark-zuckerberg-and-jack-dorseys-contrasting-aesthetics-have_x3pd.1200.jpg

  • was a new boy
    was a new boy

    #1

    Dr. Joseph Mercola

    'The NY Times is spreading disinformation, they have been sent legal notice.'

    https://twitter.com/mercola/status/1419695028130258945

  • was a new boy
    was a new boy

    'Please also encourage others to read "The Truth About COVID-19," where you will find much of the information from the past two years that people need to read to wake up and open their eyes. I am donating all earnings to the National Vaccine Information Center.'

    https://youtu.be/dILSt_EQgNM

    “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” - George Orwell

    not an ad, haven't bought the book

    'Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.' ~ Albert Einstein


  • carla
    carla

    Censorship is never a good thing. Even if you disagree with someone we should be free to discuss and have differing opinions. What is happening lately with the woke society, cancel culture and shunning the unvaccinated should not be tolerated in free society. Lest we forget-

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. - Martin Niemöller

    I will draw the same conclusion I had when my jw first joined up once again, he was warned not to look at nor listen to anything negative about the society or jw's as a whole. He in fact was threatened if he did. If your group, org, whatever is telling you that you must not look at anything negative in regard to it's beliefs that should be a huge red flag. That should spur you on to do more research not less about any subject that someone warns you off of. The cult of vaccination today is no different than what me & my jw cult member experienced when he first joined up. He is now fully immersed/assimilated with no hope in sight of real truth or even looking at real court cases, truth, or biblical changes made, etc.... I see no difference at all. The vaccinate group will not even look at why someone can't or simply will not be for scientific reasons, religious (76 abortions used not 2), long term unknowns, gullian barr (sp?) 1st trimester miscarriages , recent chemo patient, etc...etc..

    May be an image of 1 person and text that says '"If you have to be persuaded, reminded, pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized... If all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance -you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest." -lan Watson'
  • TD
    TD

    Freedom of speech indeed implies the freedom to yell fire in a crowded theater. The notion that you can’t was overturned by the Supreme Court a century ago.

    Curious, because this actually has a direct tie-in to JW's

    "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a paraphrase of the unanimous opinion in a 1919 SCOTUS case which held that opposition to military conscription was not protected speech under the 1st Amendment

    (Rutherford & Co got in trouble over essentially the same thing)

    That was partially overturned 50 years later in 1969. (Brandenburg v. Ohio) which I think might be what you're referencing (???)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit