I follow Chris Martensen, John Campbell and Bret Weinstein on YouTube. I don’t agree with everything they say but these are the facts.
Martensen and Campbell said this would be a significant pandemic in January and February 2020 when the WHO still said it could be contained.
Martensen and Campbell were calling for flights to be stopped in 2020 when the WHO and governments were saying that was disproportionate and would harm the economy.
Martensen and Campbell said the virus was clearly airborne in March 2020 when the WHO still said there was no evidence for that.
Martensen, Campbell and Weinstein said that masks could reduce your risk of catching the virus while Fauci was actively discouraging the public from using masks, and the UK government even suggested masks could be counterproductive.
When the UK government unveiled its “herd immunity” strategy of just letting everyone catch the virus Campbell and Martensen said that was nuts. The UK government backtracked and claimed they never promoted that strategy at all.
Martensen and Weinstein said the evidence pointed to a lab leak over a year ago while the government was labelling it a conspiracy theory and Facebook and YouTube were banning people who presented the evidence for a lab leak.
Martensen, Weinstein and Campbell all argue there is good evidence that Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for the virus. Many academic studies support this conclusion yet it is still being censored on YouTube, Facebook and so on.
Martensen and Weinstein argue that the vaccines may not be as safe as governments and pharmaceutical companies claim and that mass vaccination may be a short term fix but a bigger problem in the long run as they promote mutations and may have long term health consequences.
Governments, and their online henchmen, the owners of social media platforms, claim this is “false information”, but with a track record as poor as theirs, who would put their money on government agencies and social media controllers being right this time? At the very least it needs open discussion. Discussing whether Ivermectin may be an effective treatment and whether vaccines may have serious problems is the sensible way to proceed, but some would deny us even the chance to discuss it.
It’s a bizarre situation when an ordinary google search lists page after page of media proclamations that Ivermectin is a “fake cure” for Covid19, whereas a google scholar search lists pages of results in academic journals indicating Ivermectin is a safe and effective treatment for Covid19.