Cross-dressing Jehovah's Witness raped and molested girl
A cross-dressing Jehovah’s Witness raped and molested a girl while making her wear adult women’s clothes.
David Fuge, 69, wore dresses and silky underwear when he repeatedly abused his blindfolded victim from the age of eight to 19.
Liverpool Crown Court heard he gagged her and on one occasion tied a belt around her neck and left her hanging from a hook in a room.
He photographed the child naked, made her read pornographic magazines, beat her with a piece of wood and abused her at a golf course.
Fuge, of Gorsey Lane, Wallasey, admitted having a fetish for cross-dressing and that his sex life with his wife suffered when she became ill.
The OAP confessed to some sexual touching with the victim and accepted hitting her on the bottom with a stick but denied the full allegations.
He was found guilty of rape, three sexual assaults now categorised as rape, two counts of indecency with a child and 12 counts of indecent assault.
The victim sobbed in court today as Judge Norman Wright jailed Fuge for 17 years with an extended year on licence.
Best use the link as there has been some more added.
Fuge turned and waved to supporters in the public gallery when he was sent down.
Who would support this vile excuse for a human?
has he been disfellowshipped ?
Who would support this vile excuse for a human?
Donald Trump supporters.
OK, that wasn't nice (feels good, though). Hillary Clinton supporters (better?).
I made the statements above because of what I am about to write.
You will be surprised that there are always people who support the most vile and hideous criminals. There are serial killer groupies, there are people who support sex with minors and believe that it is possible to have a romantic/sexual relationship between an adult and a child.
And I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of transgender rights advocate who wants to use that to make it about transgender rights, even though cross-dressing and being transgender have nothing to do with each other.
There are people who believe that the cross-dressing part will be made as some kind of psychological problem, and they oppose to that view, hence may feel that supporting him will make people "aware" of how judgemental people are over people with those proclivities.
The list can go on and on and on. We are no longer in a world where a crime is just a crime. Crimes are now used as platforms for each one of its components to be exploited by supporters of some cause or point of view.
And there are some people who somehow convince themselves that the criminal is somehow a "victim". And there are some people who ejnoy getting negative attention by supporting a POS like that. They get a cheap thrill when people around them say "WHAT!" or something.
Nobody likes a hypocrite! I think in this case this unsavory gentleman has presented himself as an upstanding,bible bashing, self-righteous member of a Christian fundamentalist religion/cult that forbids cross-dressing "A woman shall not wear man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. Deuteronomy 22:5 NAS". The cross-dressing is just another example of his hypocrisy.
I would imagine he wasn't able to dress as nice for court as he would have liked.
A cross-dressing Jehovah’s Witness
Just when you thought you'd heard it all.
I remember this fella. Never knew him personally but he was in Wallasey South congregation, a couple from my old hall moved to that congregation and i remember his stupid sad face. He had bushy eyebrows and when he answered up he practically barked down the mic. You see the same old faces every year at the convention and thats the kind of face you dont forget.
I always thought he was one of those old school, hardline JWs that never laughs when the speaker makes a joke from the platform. Shush's people who whisper during the talks and taps people on the shoulder if they talk during the song.
I asked my ex about it, she's still sort-of friends with the couple that are in his cong. She said "we're not allowed to talk about it". Whatever that means. I cant imagine who his "supporters" are. Even when i was a JW i'dve happily kicked this man to death for harming a child.
Now remember, if this brave girl leaves the JWs because of this and lives her life free of them she'd be shunned, and if he's "repentant" he wont be.
She said "we're not allowed to talk about it".
Paley - There was a paedo in a Peterborough congregation last year (or was it early this year? My sources are a bit scant as I'm shunned for apostasy™)
), and when he was nabbed by the coppers the Jobos were told the same........not to talk about it.
I think it should be talked about..a lot!