For XJWBill - about the Evil Christianity

by Norm 15 Replies latest jw friends

  • Norm
    Norm

    Hello Bill,

    I have been away for a while so I didn’t see your reply to my post about the “final solution”. You said:

    Posted: May 25, 2001 1:50:01 AM

    You make some good points about WT hypocrisy, Norm, but Christianity as an "evil force"? I was hurt by the JW's, too, and I spent a long time afterwards as an atheist/agnostic, so I can understand your feeling bitter towards religion, any religion.

    I think your attempted psychoanalysis of me is quite off the mark. Knowledge and facts doesn’t have anything to do with being bitter, it is a conclusion I have arrived at by considering facts, not feelings, Bill. I have done a lot of research and been pondering this question for years. I have come to realize that the WTS is only a natural consequence of what is happening if someone is taking the Bible serious. The Bible in itself is an interesting book as long as the reader realizes that is just a book. It is when people get into their heads that it somehow is the “word of God” the problems start.

    But here you are making the same colossal error of judgement that the WT does--painting everything you don't like black, deep black, wickedly and hopelessly black.

    No one has to “paint” Christianity in black Bill, anyone with knowledge of history know that it is as black as it can get, that’s reality. Genocide, ethnic cleansing, crusades, slavery, burning of witches, discrimination of women, wars, discrimination of homosexuals and many other hideous atrocities. It doesn’t help much to come dragging with the old prune saying they weren't real Christian’s or they didn’t follow the Bible and such. The problem is that they found support for all their evil deeds in the “word of God”. The only reason we are not still living in the horrible world of Christendom is that wise and courageous people slowly was able to wrestle the power from Christianity to create an open and enlightened society, with human rights which we enjoy today. I don’t have to “judge” Christianity Bill, history is there for all of us to review, and it is more than enough to tell us what Christianity was and still is if they was given half a chance.

    Nope. I'm not buying it from the GB--or anyone else. Like everything else in this mortal life, the Christian religion has an admixture of good and bad, but to call it "evil" is way short of truth, good sense, or even good manners.

    Bill

    "If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)

    The history of Christianity is about everything BUT love Bill, it also show that Christians is behind the majority of the meanness in the world. I know a lot of nice and good people who profess to be Christians. All of them without exception are so in spite of being Christian, just as all the good and nice JW’s we know are so in spite of their religion. If you know a nice Moslem it is the same thing. All of them have to ignore their religion if they want to be decent human beings. Christendom as taught in the Bible is an intolerant religion. Any religion that sees the need to convert other to their faith is basically intolerant, and it will cause conflict and division and is therefore a force of evil. History has provided us with an overwhelming amount of documentation of this fact, and reality continues to provide us with it.

    We don’t have to go back many hundreds of years and I would be killed for saying what I did in this post, most likely with a crowd of cheering Christians as spectators to the execution.

    Norm.

  • Ginger
    Ginger
    Knowledge and facts doesn’t have anything to do with being bitter, it is a conclusion I have arrived at by considering facts, not feelings, Bill.

    Why don't you row your longship over my way, Norm? A little taste of honey and Ginger will soothe that bitterness away.

    Ginger

  • XJWBill
    XJWBill

    Howdy Norm,

    The phone lines in our small town have been down for a week, so I too have been away from the board, and only just came across this thread by accident.

    I stand by my original remarks. To say that Christianity (or any other major religion) is an evil force, with no redeeming goodness in it, is to commit a logical fallacy: you are setting up a false dilemma, the either/or fallacy, in precisely the same way as people who make statements like the following:

    All blacks are dirty.
    All Mexicans are lazy.
    All Indians are savages.
    All women are emotional.
    All men are jocks.
    All blondes are dumb.
    All smokers are stupid.
    All gays are sex fiends.
    All Polacks are idiots.
    All politicians are crooked.
    All Southerners are rednecks.
    All Northerners are rude.
    All whites are racists.
    And so on . . . .

    Blanket statements like these, and like yours, are almost always false. To say or imply that all Christians are taught to do only evil by their religion--and that they only do good when they "ignore their religion"--is laughably illogical and childish, and ignores the many millions of Christians through the ages who have done precisely the opposite.

    Likewise, to assert that irreligious, "enlightened" folk have always been "wise and courageous" and produced nothing but sweetness and light and delightful "open" societies is blatantly false.

    Perhaps you should read a little further in history.

    I think your attempted psychoanalysis of me is quite off the mark. Knowledge and facts doesn’t have anything to do with being bitter, it is a conclusion I have arrived at by considering facts, not feelings, Bill.

    With all due respect to you, Norm, the fact that your assertions are so illogical demonstrates that your argument is NOT based on facts. Just like the WT, you are indeed ignoring all the facts that do not fit your hypothesis--facts like St. Francis, John Newton, and Mother Teresa, among many millions of others, some famous, some obscure.

    What else can I conclude, then, but that your statements are based on feelings of revulsion for everything Christian?

    However, having said all that, let me hasten to say you are entitled to feel and say whatever you like about Christianity. I personally feel no need whatsoever to convert you or anyone else to anything at all. I am merely taking the opportunity on a public board to point out an error in thinking. Believe what you please, and be happy.

    And by the way, I was not attempting to "psychoanalyze" you, Norm. I was merely offering you my sympathy as a potential friend, based on what I, presumptuously perhaps, assumed was a common history of mistreatment by the WTBTS. Please forgive my offense.

    Peace,

    Bill

    "If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)

  • Norm
    Norm

    Hi Bill,

    You seem to misunderstand the whole matter, or is that deliberately?

    The history of Christianity is one long tale of bloodshed, cruelty and genocide. It makes the crime of Nazism pale in comparison.

    Somehow the crimes of Christianity seem acceptable to you. Do you feel the same way about the crimes of the Nazi's?

    Or do you feel that we shouldn't use the same standard when considering the two evil forces?

    Norm.

  • XJWBill
    XJWBill

    Howdy Norm,

    I first started to write a terse reply to your latest post, advising you to go find a JW if you are spoiling for a fight. They love these sorts of debates, but I have long since gotten over the desire to save, convert, or change anyone. It's not my job anymore.

    However, upon reflection, it occurred to me that your pugnacious attitude may in fact be a cover for a real desire to find some goodness in Christianity after all (pray forgive me if that is too “psychoanalytical”). Therefore, I will proceed this one more time to treat your questions as a serious inquiry and give you the best answer I can—-though if you really want a deep, intellectual defense of Christian belief versus the problem of evil, I must refer you to C. S. Lewis (e.g., "The Problem of Pain") and other apologists better than I.

    Your equating Christianity with Nazism is absurd on its face. The guiding idea at the core of Nazism was overweening pride--the self-aggrandizement of the German people in general, and the National Socialist party in particular, at the expense of all other peoples and parties. Its selfish and hate-filled philosophy, if you can call it that, harked backed to that of Nietzche and other immodest, atheistic, ego-worshipping thinkers who essentially declared that only a “superman” or a superior race was fit to enjoy freedom and domination of the world, while all other men, inferior and servile, ought and must be subservient, sacrificing their freedom, industry, and lives for the benefit of the few.

    It is no wonder, then, that such a philosophy produced criminals and crimes on a scale utterly unparalleled in history, so that the exact opposite of your statement is true, and was recognized to be true by the people and leaders of those Christian nations—-as they were called then—-that fought to exterminate the filth of Nazism from the earth: namely, that the crimes of Hitler and his minions made all other crimes pale in comparison.

    My own father, who was not, by the way, particularly religious, fought in that war against evil; was actually under fire and fired back at the Germans, may have killed a few, though he was not proud of the fact. However, he and everyone else at the war’s end was very glad of the triumph of what Mr. Churchill routinely called Christian civilization. And for you, Norm, to tell me now that my father and all his kin and friends who joined in that fight were merely following another, even more heinous, evil philosophy—-well, it is a patently juvenile and ridiculous statement, and if you have any conscience at all, you should be ashamed to make it.

    Your black-and-white vision of what you call “reality” and history is in fact exactly what the Nazis—-and other totalitarian regimes-—sought to inculcate in their deluded followers. Hitler would have loved you, for your lack of balance, moderation, and insight would have made you ripe for the picking. (You fell for the Watchtower, didn't you?)

    In contrast to the straw man of Nazism that you have set up, the core idea at the heart of Christianity is, not a selfish grab for domination, but self-sacrificing love. “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you,” “Love God with all your strength, and your neighbor as yourself,” “He that would be greatest of all must be the servant of all,” “Do not return evil for evil, but keep overcoming the evil with the good,” “Bless your enemies and pray for them who persecute you,” “Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends,” “I say to you, you must forgive your brother seven times seventy times,” “Let us love, neither in words nor with the tongue, but in deed and in truth,” “He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.”

    Now, Norm—-regardless of whether you believe Jesus is the Son of God, or merely an itinerant teacher-—regardless of whether you believe the Bible is divinely inspired, or merely a collection of solely man-made writings—you cannot with any credibility equate the filthy, hateful ravings of a madman like Hitler—-or any other of that ilk—-with the central impulse of Christianity, as noted in the quotations above. To lump both philosophies together as “evil forces” is utterly to destroy all meaning of the words “evil” and “good”—-to speak utter and obvious nonsense that even a schoolchild can recognize.

    And now, having established the philosophical background, let me proceed to your main point: that “Christianity” has bloodthirstily sought nothing but genocide, slavery, witch burnings, intolerance, etc., etc.

    But to speak honestly, we must first distinguish what you really mean by the word “Christianity.” The word can refer to a system of thought and belief, which I have just demonstrated is anything but evil. Or the word can refer collectively to those organizations—-Churches—-that have promoted and taught Christian beliefs. Or, more loosely, the word can refer to political entities that offer at least nominal allegiance either to a particular Church or to Christian ideals in general. Or even more loosely, it can refer to the mass of Christian believers in general. The latter two ideas are usually more particularly refered to as “Christendom” to distinguish people and governments from beliefs and ideas.

    So are you saying that 1) churches, 2) governments, or 3) individuals have sometimes been guilty of terrible deeds, all the while calling themselves Christian? I think that really is part of what you are getting at, and if you will limit your statement to that, you are quite right. Proud, self-righteous, greedy men and women, as individuals, groups, or organziations, have from time to time either A) turned a deaf ear to the voice of their consciences, ignoring the basic Christian principles, B) by defect of logic and fullness of pride misconstrued those principles, or C) worst of all, misused the sublime teachings of Christ as a pretext, a cover, for their own lustful, greedy motives.

    You are right to be indignant at such a perversion of good teachings, as are all decent-minded Christians themselves.

    But you do not limit yourself to such a circumscribed statement. You proceed to assert or imply that all Christians in all times and all places have been all evil. Norm, that is really childish of you. Not to mention patently false, as “history,” to which you are so fond of appealing, also bears full and ample witness.

    By way of analogy, let me refer you to the Constitution of the United States, a document which explicitly condones the practice of slavery and by implication the subjugation of the Indian peoples. Does that fact make it an evil document, Norm, and the government which it establishes an evil government for an evil people? American democracy is imperfect, even flawed, but is it completely and absolutely and irredeemably evil? There are some who would answer yes—-but they are, like a certain disturbed individual now awaiting execution in Oklahoma, themselves obviously terribly, terribly flawed in their thinking.

    I have not the time nor space here to make a catalogue of all good Christian people through the ages and all good deeds done by them; these are just as truly “facts” as the misdeeds you cite. If you are as well-read as you say your are, they should all, or at least a great many of them, be well known to you. If Christianity is truly and thoroughly “evil,” how then can you account for the great goodness of such “facts” as St. Francis, John Newton, and Mother Teresa, to name but three of many millions of good people—-good by reason of, not despite, their religion?

    Nor do time and space allow me to recount the unselfish goodness of many obscure, unknown Christians of my acquaintance, my own family, friends, neighbors, and passing strangers. Even I, one of the least of Christians, have on occasion risked my safety, my money, or at least my own convenience to do something good for others—-though I will not be so immodest as to recount the uninteresting details here. Surely you have taken your head out of the history books long enough to look around you? Have you no eyes to see, Norm? Are we Christians really as wicked as those Nazis? Really, Norm? Really?

    At this very moment, all over the world, there are many millions of Christians who would, if they knew you needed help, give you food, shelter, clothing, medical care—-even, if need be, endanger their own lives to save yours, Norm--strictly on account of their "evil" religion, not because it would profit them an iota. How many Nazis or other such selfish, hateful folk would do the same for you? Is it really all the same? Really?

    Even the God I worship loves you enough to die for you, Norm—-and did, as I devoutly believe. What more do you want?

    Believe as you wish, and be happy.

    Peace,

    Bill

    "If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)

  • jelly
    jelly

    I really do not have much to add here. I just wanted to say that I liked XJWBill’s post and I respect Norm’s logic. The whole thing about Christianity being bad/good to me really boils down to the nature of mankind. Really acts of violence and bloodshed were common in all cultures even ones that did not have Christianity so I don’t see religion as being the cause, sometimes it was given as the reason but without Christianity another reason would have been created and you would have had just as much bloodshed.

    The reason for bloodshed usually is mankind’s desire for power, control, or just the desire to fight.

    Jelly

  • Norm
    Norm

    Hi There Bill,

    I see that this some lessons in history is in order here.

    You said:

    Howdy Norm,

    I first started to write a terse reply to your latest post, advising you to go find a JW if you are spoiling for a fight. They love these sorts of debates, but I have long since gotten over the desire to save, convert, or change anyone. It's not my job anymore.
    However, upon reflection, it occurred to me that your pugnacious attitude may in fact be a cover for a real desire to find some goodness in Christianity after all (pray forgive me if that is too “psychoanalytical”). Therefore, I will proceed this one more time to treat your questions as a serious inquiry and give you the best answer I can—-though if you really want a deep, intellectual defense of Christian belief versus the problem of evil, I must refer you to C. S. Lewis (e.g., "The Problem of Pain") and other apologists better than I.

    So far I haven’t been debating, but only stated a few facts with which you obviously disagree.

    Your equating Christianity with Nazism is absurd on its face. The guiding idea at the core of Nazism was overweening pride--the self-aggrandizement of the German people in general, and the National Socialist party in particular, at the expense of all other peoples and parties. Its selfish and hate-filled philosophy, if you can call it that, harked backed to that of Nietzche and other immodest, atheistic, ego-worshipping thinkers who essentially declared that only a “superman” or a superior race was fit to enjoy freedom and domination of the world, while all other men, inferior and servile, ought and must be subservient, sacrificing their freedom, industry, and lives for the benefit of the few.

    I cannot but ascribe such a statement as you make above to gross ignorance about history in general and the history of anti-Semitism in particular. The Nazi anti-Semitism wasn’t invented by the Nazis. It was started in the Bible, by the gospel writers and Paul. The first Christian emperor was Constantine. Already before he came to power some of the non Christian emperors had made anti-Semitic laws.

    Constantine renewed them and made them a stronger. Already in the Synod in Elvira year 300 CE outlawed marriage between Christian and Jew. It also prohibited Christians mixing socially with Jews. Constantine called them an “evil race”, “blood soaked people” they were “born insane”, and on the famous meeting in Nicea it became prohibited for Jews to keep Christian slaves because it would be unjust for a Christian to be slave to those who murdered the prophets and the Lord. (Eusebio, Vita Constant. 3, 17ff.)

    In the middle of the 300 the first synagogue was destroyed by Bishop Innocencious in Dertona in North Italy and all the property of the Jews there was confiscated. At about the same time the synagogue in Tipsa in North Africa was turnfered into a church. In 388 a synagogue on the Euphrates was burned on the order of Bishop Kallinikon. The Emperor Theodosius wanted the arsonist punished but Bishop Ambrosius defended the arsonist and said that it was a lawful act. The same Ambrosius wrote a dozen ani-Jewish letters, he said that he would have torched the synagogue himself as he couldn’t tolerate a place where “Christ was denied”. (Letters. Ambrosius of Milan)

    In 415 Bishop Cyril confiscated all the synagogues in Egypt and turned them into churches. In Alexandria all of them should be destroyed and all the property of the Jews should be confiscated and they should be chased out of the city. (Socrates the Church historian). In the middle ages Europe became an increasingly difficult place for the Jews. In France the Synode in Agde in 506 decided that people who ate together with Jews should be excommunicated. More and more anti-Jewish laws was passed on a number of synods. The Archbishop Agobard of Lyon (died 840) a Spaniard wrote 5 anti-Jewish treaties where he among other things he said that already Pilate had ordered the Jews to worship Jesus, and that Jewish rabbis tasted the blood of menstruating women to find out if it was unclean and other sick accusations. He was also the one who coined the later famous Nazi slogan, “Do not buy from the Jews”. During the Nazi years I Germany a Jesuit priest published Agobards treaties of the Jews in German. In Spain it wasn’t much better for the Jews and in Germany the problems really started for them at the same time the Crusades got going. In 1298 all the Jews in Röttingen, Bavaria were killed and their houses destroyed. The crime? They were supposed to have stabbed an Image of Christ. In the years to come this was usually the standard accusation. The proof was that these Christ images was bleeding.

    Because of such accusations all the Jews in Degendorf in lower Bavaria was murdered by the Catholics in 1337, this way they got rid of the loans they had with the Jews and gained all the Jewish property and real estate. In 1349, 2000 Jews was burned in Strassburg and all they owned was handed out to the Christians. In the same year the Catholics killed almost all the Jews in 350 German church districts, the majority was burned alive. It is well known that Luther wasn’t any big fan of the Jews either. The anti-Semitic Nazi newspaper “Sturmer” had a lot to learn from Luther when it came to derogatory characterizations of the Jews. The infamous Nazi slaughter Julius Streicher used Luther to defend his views in the Nuremberg trial. The Nazi’s was just carrying out a good old Christian tradition Bill, that’s the fact of the matter.

    It is no wonder, then, that such a philosophy produced criminals and crimes on a scale utterly unparalleled in history, so that the exact opposite of your statement is true, and was recognized to be true by the people and leaders of those Christian nations—-as they were called then—-that fought to exterminate the filth of Nazism from the earth: namely, that the crimes of Hitler and his minions made all other crimes pale in comparison.

    As you can see from my little history lesson above, the Christian “philosophy” produced criminals of such caliber long before anyone had heard about the Nazi’s.
    But the Christians wasn’t only concerned with killing Jews. They were equally eager to root out and kill all that didn’t buy their brand of faith. Their hunt for “Heretics” was equally as bloody, yes worse than their slaughter of Jews. Space doesn’t allow me to go through all the details. In 1489, the infamous publication “Mallus maleficorum” or the “Witch hammer” was published for the first time, and after that thousands of innocent women was burned or killed in the most hideous manner, the last witch process was taking place in Berlin as late as 1728, and the latest in Europe was in Glarus, Switzerland in 1782, yes in 1823 in Delden, Holland there was carried out a “water test” of a suspected witch.

    My own father, who was not, by the way, particularly religious, fought in that war against evil; was actually under fire and fired back at the Germans, may have killed a few, though he was not proud of the fact. However, he and everyone else at the war’s end was very glad of the triumph of what Mr. Churchill routinely called Christian civilization. And for you, Norm, to tell me now that my father and all his kin and friends who joined in that fight were merely following another, even more heinous, evil philosophy—-well, it is a patently juvenile and ridiculous statement, and if you have any conscience at all, you should be ashamed to make it.

    As history show Christianity isn’t as such very civilized. The Civilization we live in today was created by wrestling the power away from the Christians. The American founding fathers knew and understood this very well, that is why they saw to it that the Church should have no political power. The western democracies we live in today became possible in spite of the Christians not because of them. Your father’s and all his comrades in arms who fought the Nazis is to be highly commended for that. My country was occupied by the Nazi’s but I am born after the war, so I haven’t got any first had experience of it. My conscience is in perfect working order, but I am not regarding this as an emotional matter, what your father have got to do with this I simply fail to see. Do you honestly believe he was fighting for Christ or Christianity?

    Your black-and-white vision of what you call “reality” and history is in fact exactly what the Nazis—-and other totalitarian regimes-—sought to inculcate in their deluded followers. Hitler would have loved you, for your lack of balance, moderation, and insight would have made you ripe for the picking. (You fell for the Watchtower, didn't you?)

    Your problem here is that my “vision” of this isn’t black and white, Bill. History show that most ordinary Christians had no problems living side by side with the Jews. It was the Church leaders and some of the Christian gentry who was behind most of the problems. They could however not have murdered thousands of people without the more or less willing cooperation of their subjects. Just like Hitler couldn’t have succeeded without the support of millions of “ordinary” Germans. Were the average Christian or German personally evil people? No, of course not, still they became for the most part more or less willing tools for evil. You don't have to be evil to do eveil, you just have to be indifferent, unconcerned, not care. As I have stated before the history of Christendom demonstrate a very evil movement, and it still have an enormous potential for evil if it were to get the kind of power it once had. I do not doubt for a minute that if the Christian churches was given the power they had in the dark ages they would turn our lives into a nightmare again.

    In contrast to the straw man of Nazism that you have set up, the core idea at the heart of Christianity is, not a selfish grab for domination, but self-sacrificing love. “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you,” “Love God with all your strength, and your neighbor as yourself,” “He that would be greatest of all must be the servant of all,” “Do not return evil for evil, but keep overcoming the evil with the good,” “Bless your enemies and pray for them who persecute you,” “Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends,” “I say to you, you must forgive your brother seven times seventy times,” “Let us love, neither in words nor with the tongue, but in deed and in truth,” “He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.”

    As documented the comparison between Christianity and Nazism is a very valid one. Nazism was and is a consequence of a two thousand year old Christian culture.

    Now, Norm—-regardless of whether you believe Jesus is the Son of God, or merely an itinerant teacher-—regardless of whether you believe the Bible is divinely inspired, or merely a collection of solely man-made writings—you cannot with any credibility equate the filthy, hateful ravings of a madman like Hitler—-or any other of that ilk—-with the central impulse of Christianity, as noted in the quotations above. To lump both philosophies together as “evil forces” is utterly to destroy all meaning of the words “evil” and “good”—-to speak utter and obvious nonsense that even a schoolchild can recognize.

    As I have documented, all that Hitler was doing was repeating all those filthy, hateful ravings which had been written down by Christian Bishops and Monks and Luther many years before.
    Of course I understand that you are ignorant about such facts, so I suggest that you sit down and educate yourself before you dismiss such matters in this manner.

    And now, having established the philosophical background, let me proceed to your main point: that “Christianity” has bloodthirstily sought nothing but genocide, slavery, witch burnings, intolerance, etc., etc.
    But to speak honestly, we must first distinguish what you really mean by the word “Christianity.” The word can refer to a system of thought and belief, which I have just demonstrated is anything but evil. Or the word can refer collectively to those organizations—-Churches—-that have promoted and taught Christian beliefs. Or, more loosely, the word can refer to political entities that offer at least nominal allegiance either to a particular Church or to Christian ideals in general. Or even more loosely, it can refer to the mass of Christian believers in general. The latter two ideas are usually more particularly refered to as “Christendom” to distinguish people and governments from beliefs and ideas.

    Christianity has bloodthirstily sought to destroy everything they saw as a threat to their power. And they did so as long as they could hold on to that kind of power. The Christians has used the Bible as they have seen fit, and they have found excuses for their despicable behavior in that very book. Of course there have been admirable and good people within Christianity as there has been admirable individuals among Hindu’s, Moslem and other religions, but as I have pointed out before that have always been in spite of their religious affiliations. No matter how much hand waving and special pleading you do, history speaks for itself.

    So are you saying that 1) churches, 2) governments, or 3) individuals have sometimes been guilty of terrible deeds, all the while calling themselves Christian? I think that really is part of what you are getting at, and if you will limit your statement to that, you are quite right. Proud, self-righteous, greedy men and women, as individuals, groups, or organziations, have from time to time either A) turned a deaf ear to the voice of their consciences, ignoring the basic Christian principles, B) by defect of logic and fullness of pride misconstrued those principles, or C) worst of all, misused the sublime teachings of Christ as a pretext, a cover, for their own lustful, greedy motives.

    I am saying that history demonstrate a huge movement that got political power around 300 CE. And that movement, Christianity grew into an incredibly evil force, that held mankind in a stranglehold for almost 1700 years. The enormous wealth of the Catholic church was accumulated during that time. Whether they were “misusing” the alleged “words of Jesus” isn’t really of much interest. It doesn’t help all those poor people they tortured or murdered. Christianity as such haven’t changed in any profound way. When you are in the business of selling illusions and fairy tales about the unknown that in reality amounts to nothing but thin air, style and pomp is important. Absolute power, like they enjoyed in the dark ages makes such con jobs much easier, because then you can coerce and threaten people into submission.
    In those days I would be dead long ago.

    You are right to be indignant at such a perversion of good teachings, as are all decent-minded Christians themselves.
    But you do not limit yourself to such a circumscribed statement. You proceed to assert or imply that all Christians in all times and all places have been all evil. Norm, that is really childish of you. Not to mention patently false, as “history,” to which you are so fond of appealing, also bears full and ample witness.

    I am not indignant about any perversion of teachings. You don’t have to pervert the teachings of the Bible, they are already pervert. As you can see I do no such thing, as “assert and imply” that all Christians are evil. As I have stated before, there has no doubt been many nice and good people who have happened to belong to the Christian camp, but in order to be such good people they had to dismiss the bulk of the Bible.
    Indeed history give us examples of such outstanding people, but they were alas few and far between.

    By way of analogy, let me refer you to the Constitution of the United States, a document which explicitly condones the practice of slavery and by implication the subjugation of the Indian peoples. Does that fact make it an evil document, Norm, and the government which it establishes an evil government for an evil people? American democracy is imperfect, even flawed, but is it completely and absolutely and irredeemably evil? There are some who would answer yes—-but they are, like a certain disturbed individual now awaiting execution in Oklahoma, themselves obviously terribly, terribly flawed in their thinking.
    I have not the time nor space here to make a catalogue of all good Christian people through the ages and all good deeds done by them; these are just as truly “facts” as the misdeeds you cite. If you are as well-read as you say your are, they should all, or at least a great many of them, be well known to you. If Christianity is truly and thoroughly “evil,” how then can you account for the great goodness of such “facts” as St. Francis, John Newton, and Mother Teresa, to name but three of many millions of good people—-good by reason of, not despite, their religion?

    Yes, in spite of the very hypocritical standards of that Constitution it provided the basis for something that could later be corrected, when decent people which was fought every step of the way by the Christians was able to get slavery abolished. I don’t see what the Constitution has to do with this matter but no doubt you have an idea what you meant by bringing it up. As I have now stated several times, good and decent individual can be found but that doesn’t change the recorded history of the Christian Church.

    Nor do time and space allow me to recount the unselfish goodness of many obscure, unknown Christians of my acquaintance, my own family, friends, neighbors, and passing strangers. Even I, one of the least of Christians, have on occasion risked my safety, my money, or at least my own convenience to do something good for others—-though I will not be so immodest as to recount the uninteresting details here. Surely you have taken your head out of the history books long enough to look around you? Have you no eyes to see, Norm? Are we Christians really as wicked as those Nazis? Really, Norm? Really?

    Again, I don’t doubt that there are good decent Christians around, including you. You do however belong to a movement which have proved itself capable of enormous evil, in the past. And as a movement still has that capacity. You just have to look to your fundamentalist brothers in the US to see what they would do if they had the power. They make no secret about what they would do. Steve Allen estimated that they would almost immediately have to kill about 120 million Americans. So they are still out there Bill. I of course have no way of knowing what you personally would do in such a situation, but my guess is that a lot of Americans would become extremely “Christian” over night.

    At this very moment, all over the world, there are many millions of Christians who would, if they knew you needed help, give you food, shelter, clothing, medical care—-even, if need be, endanger their own lives to save yours, Norm--strictly on account of their "evil" religion, not because it would profit them an iota. How many Nazis or other such selfish, hateful folk would do the same for you? Is it really all the same? Really?

    Even the God I worship loves you enough to die for you, Norm—-and did, as I devoutly believe. What more do you want?
    Believe as you wish, and be happy.

    Peace,
    Bill

    "If we all loved one another as much as we say we love God, I reckon there wouldn't be as much meanness in the world as there is."--from the movie Resurrection (1979)

    As there are millions of Hindus, Moslems, Buddhists, Atheists, Chinese etc which would do the same, all admirable kind and good people, but what has that got to do with the Crimes of Christianity?

    Yes, Bill I am already happy. Knowledge, enlightenment and a relatively good health is a good reason to be happy.

    Take care,

    Norm.

  • Tina
    Tina

    Hi Norm,

    Thanks for the thought provoking posts. The historical data as well.

    One only has to to study the history of christianity to see it for what it really is.

    From it's very inception,christianity has tried to make the 'world safe for truth,justice and love' by using cruelty,punishment and censorship.
    They rarely if ever admit that they've been the primary instigators of the forces of 'evil' they labor so hard to combat.

    Christianity is a mass of contradictions.

    From a histroical standpoint,they see no logical flaw in making people suffer to end suffering.

    They see their actions as totally selfless-even if they'r burning you or torturing you. After all,it's for your own good and the good of humanity (their thinking) :>.

    Christianity's bloody and heinous history has a lot to do with it's black and white thinking. The world is more ambiguous than unkind but they seldom appreciate this subtle distinction.
    Throughout history christians who have this black and white moral code have spent their lives following rather arbitrary rules because they expect concrete rewards for such. They don't understand that virtue is its own reward.
    They keep expecting some higher power to step in and praise the saints and punish the sinners,lol.
    Christians invented heaven and hell for this purpose,but as history shows the after life isn't soon enough to settle this score.
    Historically speaking they have felt they have to step in and do gods work. And from this dysfunctional mindset, they have initiated and perpaetrated some of the most evil crimes in history.
    Just my dos centavos Norm,luv ya,Tina

  • emyrose
    emyrose
    One only has to to study the history of christianity to see it for what it really is.

    Hi Tina, you sound like a very knowledgeable individual,
    and obviously college educated. I always enjoy reading your
    posts. Did you come to this conclusion after taking courses
    in college or from reading atheistic literature? Which
    one was more influential? I'm curious because I've taken
    Liberal Arts courses that have always presented religion,
    including christianity, in a less negative light. Religions
    have functions in society, which are not exclusively harmful
    or mostly damaging. Also, can you clarify which conceptions of christianity you are referring to since there are many.

    Thanks, Emyrose
    PS, I'm sure you have a busy life so if you don't respond
    I'll understand. I'll probably ask you in the chat room anyway.

  • Tina
    Tina

    Hi emy!!

    Thanks for your response :>

    I can answer one question right now. (I will get back later on the other points)

    I started seeing this before I attended uni. I didn't find what I learned from atheistic lit at all. I began with exploring history,topics that interested me. Example, "Lives of the Popes". One book led to another(doesn't it usually? lol)
    It's all out there. Their own history condemns them.

    University expanded my research by opening up new avenues of exploration. Anthropolgy,psychology etc. I came to the conclusions I have on my own taking an open minded ,objective non-emotional approach. I was interested in verifiable information.

    In the back of my mind,I always hoped to find support regarding christian concepts. I didn't. I found it wanting. From there,I reassessed much of my thinking. Realizing I could no longer suspend reason and logic regarding this. I'll get back to you later to clarify this. Hugs,Tina

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit