The King of the North and the South, who are they now?

by Anony Mous 17 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • careful
    careful

    "King of the North? Russia and pals at any moment, but beware things could change, they could be overlapping....." love it mikeflood!

    Then there's always the option that the the King of the N and S could become acceptable and unacceptable fragments! "The four basic components of the King of the N are ..." And the faithful will be hanging on every word...

    Stay tuned to David Splane. The suspense is huge...

  • Rattigan350
    Rattigan350

    It is the same as it has been since the 1950s. Nothing has changed. Russia and USA.

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    Rattigan350:

    It is the same as it has been since the 1950s. Nothing has changed. Russia and USA.

    Essentially yes. And on that basis, it’s not hard to see why the Russian government would ban a sect that is not only ostensibly American, but also says USSR/Russia is a biblical ‘beast’ that God will soon destroy (in a totally non-extremist way).

  • Rocketman123
    Rocketman123

    The King of the North in ancient biblical times is relating to the King of Israel and the King of the South was referring to the King of Judah.

    There is no identifiable association to any modern day country accept within imaginative delusions.(via prophecy)

  • Jeffro
    Jeffro

    Rocketman123:

    The King of the North in ancient biblical times is relating to the King of Israel and the King of the South was referring to the King of Judah.

    No. As used in Daniel, the ‘king of the north’ refers to the (Syrian) Seleucid kings and the ‘king of the south’ refers to the (Egyptian) Ptolemaic kings. The story in Daniel chapter 11 traces those kings from around 333BC to 164BC.

    There is no identifiable association to any modern day country accept within imaginative delusions.(via prophecy)

    Correct.

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    The writer of Daniel made little attempt at prophecy, when he did, he failed, as when predicting the death of Antiochus 1V, .... he got it wrong, and did not realise it had actually happened as he wrote.

    It is a Politco/Religious Tract for its day, which was at the very end of Antiochus' reign, circa 164 C.E., it was never intended to "point forward" to our, or any future time.

    The Apocalyptic style predictions were typical of the genre, but in this case may well have been included more to mask its real intention, that of castigating the rulers of the day.

  • Vidiot
    Vidiot

    I always suspected (even back when I was still in) that the Org leadership experienced mild panic when the old Soviet Union unexpectedly collapsed.

    They must have breathed a huge sigh of relief when Putin started acting all Bond-villain-y.

  • Rocketman123
    Rocketman123

    The WTS's expressed doctrine of the king of the North against the king of the South is one many compelling propagations of ignorance this organization produced.

    The WTS wants to keep people on edge or fear that Armageddon is just around the corner and it does so intentionally to instill power and control over the flock of followers.

    These proclamations also helped in attracting attention to the literature the WTS published.

    Millions now living will be fooled and conned .

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit