on two occasions you decided I was using patronising language towards you and you sent me a pm to which I could not reply (my replies are inactivated or not working properly) - in fact I was and am not intending to be patronising at all but grant that this may be how you feel when I do not agree with you or when I suggest that asking for observable evidence is making a complex problem too simplistic and that some questions and debates need to remain open as social policy (in religion, in politics and in economics) is made by means of interpretations and speculations on whatever paradigm is in use at a time in history. And this is the reason why there is a need to continue discussing speculations and interpretations.
From my pov I always try to bring something meaningful to the table and to the dialogue and it is never my objective to be patronizing though I do write in a way that indicates that I desire to be treated as an equal.
edit: I think it is valid to point out when we are being GB like as I think in an unconscious state this may be our resting way of thinking. When we become conscious we stand back from things, we reason in our minds and think things through before we act. We have at least three systems in our bodies that mindlessly churn on without thought and is any wonder that there are systems in the world that seem to do the same or that seem to want to implement this way of living?