Another Subliminal Image? On the JW Website

by The Searcher 23 Replies latest jw friends

  • The Searcher
    The Searcher

    This image appears on the current main web page - as you scroll the "witnessing" photos.

    Weird "facial" image at the guy's right shoulder.


  • stillin
    stillin

    I don't know...it's awfully subliminal.

  • fulltimestudent
    fulltimestudent

    Smile, or, it's more likely a great example of human pareidolia :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

  • Splash
    Splash

    Not that weird, it's just how Asian guys look.

  • maninthemiddle
    maninthemiddle

    Long shutter times do that, it's someone walking by the camera during the exposure.

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    LOL @ Splash!

    But seriously, fulltimestudent NAILED it.

    Our minds are evolved to recognize patterns. Sometimes our minds fool us.

  • OrphanCrow
    OrphanCrow

    Digital photography. It captures and translates light weirdly - differently than the human camera, the eye, does. Odd shapes are common. This one is a purse/backpack.

  • smiddy
    smiddy

    Splash you need glasses , thats a gal not a guy , obviously a double exposure , yes ?

    Also she`s a Superhero judging by the speed she used to get behind the guy as the photo was being taken

    Then again she might be an Angel , do Angels wear glasses ? Fallen Angels ?

  • OrphanCrow
    OrphanCrow
    smiddy: obviously a double exposure , yes ?

    Not really. More like a delayed exposure. Sort of the result of the time it took the camera to figure out what it was seeing and the time it took to translate it into light patterns - those two things intersect strangely sometimes, especially at low light conditions

    A double exposure is a film term...done either deliberately in camera or in the darkroom or by accident. Forgot to turn the spindle to the next frame. And grandpa's head grows out of the rose bush.

  • Heartsafire
    Heartsafire

    Subliminal messages planted within WT pics have been around a long time. But, I do not think this is the case here.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit