wt
98 2/1 p.19, par. 6 - "Further,
other sheep lay hold
of the new
covenant just as foreigners
of old laid hold
of the Law covenant. In what way? Not
by becoming participants
in it but by
submitting to the laws associated with it and benefiting from its arrangements."
Doesn't
Deuteronomy 29:10-15 clearly
reject this corrupt teaching of the Wizards of Warwick?
10
“All of you
are stationed
today before Jehovah your God, the heads of your tribes, your
elders,
your officers, every man of Israel,
11
your children, your
wives, and your
foreign resident who
is in the midst of your camp,
from
the one gathering your wood to the one drawing your water.
12
You are here in order
to enter into the
covenant of Jehovah your
God and his oath,
which
Jehovah your God is making with you today
13
in order that he may
establish you today as
his people and
that he may be your
God, just
as
he has promised you and just as he swore to your forefathers,
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
14
"Now it
is not with you alone that
I am making this
covenant and this
oath,
15
but it is with
those standing here with us today before
Jehovah our God and with those
who
are not here with us today."
Rahab
and Ruth were
foreigners and were accepted as full
members of the
nation of Israel.
If
they hadn't been,
the Messianic lineage would have been corrupted by non-Israelites.
As
such, why does the self-appointed "slave" insist on a type/anti-type
application, in order for
"non-anointed" J.W.'s to be classed as "foreigners?"
(w85 3/1 p. 15 par. 15)