Another Outright Lie Published 2/17 WT

by LostGeneration 35 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Londo111
    Londo111

    The wordplay is interesting: He discerned that Christ would return invisibly and that “the appointed times of the nations” would end in 1914.

    In a certain way, the sentence is technically true. Russell taught Christ had returned invisibly in 1874 and he believed the Gentile times would end in 1914. Of course, it is highly misleading...the rank and file would read this as Russell teaching the invisible presence would begin in 1914.

    But then again, they just said they could err. They just demonstrated it.


  • BluesBrother
    BluesBrother

    I was struck by the line of reasoning in this article :

    13 Evidence of holy spirit. The holy spirit has helped the Governing Body to grasp Scriptural truths not previously understood. For example, reflect on the list of beliefs clarified that was referred to in the preceding paragraph. Surely, no human deserves credit for discovering and explaining these “deep things of God”! (Read 1 Corinthians 2:10.) The Governing Body echoes the apostle Paul, who wrote: “These things we also speak, not with words taught by human wisdom, but with those taught by the spirit.” (1 Cor. 2:13) After centuries of apostasy and spiritual darkness, can anything other than holy spirit explain the rapid increase in spiritual understanding since 1919?

    Then

    14 Evidence of angelic assistance. The Governing Body today has the colossal task of overseeing an international preaching work involving over eight million evangelizers. Why has that work been so successful? For one, angels are involved. (ReadRevelation 14:6, 7.) In many cases, publishers have called on individuals who had just been praying for help! * The overall growth of the preaching and disciple-making work despite fierce opposition in some lands has likewise been possible only with superhuman assistance.
    They say that the growth in numbers and in development in understanding could only be attributed to the Holy Spirit and the angels. But could it? Are there no other answers? even if we thought they had remarkable developments..

    There is a well known line of fallacious reasoning :

    An appeal to ignorance ((argumentum ad ignoratiam) proposes that we accept the truth of a proposition unless an opponent can prove otherwise. Thus, for example:
    No one has conclusively proven that there is no intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter.Therefore, there is intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter.......But, of course, the absence of evidence against a proposition is not enough to secure its truth. What we don't know could nevertheless be so.
  • Magwitch
    Magwitch
    The Governing Body is neither inspired nor infallible. Therefore, it can err in doctrinal matters or in organizational direction.

    I find it interesting that they use the word it instead of they.......

  • Ding
    Ding

    The overall growth of the preaching and disciple-making work despite fierce opposition in some lands has likewise been possible only with superhuman assistance.

    Do they explain the growth of other groups the same way?

    No, not unless "superhuman assistance" = demonism...

  • stuckinarut2
    stuckinarut2

    So, a simple question? (for the GB:)

    "If God is supposedly directing the GB, is it GOD that gets things wrong, or is it the GB? If it is the GB that is wrong (because the Almighty can never be wrong), then does that prove that GOD is NOT directing the Society?"

    Or more concisely:

    "So is it GOD or the SOCIETY that is wrong??"

  • fastJehu
    fastJehu

    Magwitch
    I find it interesting that they use the word it instead of they.......
    The Governing Body is neither inspired nor infallible. Therefore, it can err in doctrinal matters or in organizational direction.

    In german language "they" is used.

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    The WTS has always published that wts is not infallible (MAKING MISTAKES, ERRONEOUS), so it is not a surprise that wts puts it in print again, but WT fallibility has always been linked with "progressive understanding" and "adjusted view" , "off by timing" in the minds of JW.; something that JW have been used to throughout the years. But now in the posted article, the wts says outright that wt can ERR on DOCTRINE.. and those words do not have the same buffered impact on the JW mind.

  • TruthShallSetYouFree
    TruthShallSetYouFree

    In 2014, the Governing Body published a book titled God's Kingdom Rules, and in that book they openly admit the decades-long error of the teaching of the 1874 invisible return of Christ. This book is currently available on JW.org. Here's the key passage:

    "5 As we saw in Chapter 2 of this book, the Bible Students spent decades pointing out that the year 1914 would be significant in fulfilling Bible prophecy. However, at that time they believed that Christ’s presence had begun in 1874, that he had begun to rule in heaven in 1878, and that the Kingdom would not be fully set up until October 1914. The harvest would extend from 1874 to 1914 and would culminate in the gathering of the anointed to heaven. Do mistaken ideas such as these cast doubt on whether Jesus was guiding those faithful ones by means of holy spirit?

    6 Not at all! Think again of our opening illustration. Would the premature ideas and eager questions of the tourists cast doubt on the reliability of their guide? Hardly! Similarly, although God’s people sometimes try to work out details of Jehovah’s purpose before it is time for the holy spirit to guide them to such truths, it is clear that Jesus is leading them. Thus, faithful ones prove willing to be corrected and humbly adjust their views.—Jas. 4:6."

    So, if in a 2014 book the Governing Body openly admitted the error of the 1874 date, why would they be trying to hide information about that error in the February 2017 Watchtower (study edition)?

    Well, of course it is possible that the Governing Body came to regret the admission in 2014 of that embarrassing error, and so now has a policy of hiding that error. Or perhaps there are opposing factions within the Governing Body, some members wanting to admit past errors, some wanting to hide past errors, with one faction sometimes getting the upper hand for a time, and then losing power to the other faction.

    That's possible. What do you think?


  • prologos
    prologos
    TSSYF: " However, at that time they believed that Christ’s presence had begun in 1874, that he had begun to rule in heaven in 1878, and that the Kingdom would not be fully set up until October 1914. The harvest would extend from 1874 to 1914 and would culminate in the gathering of the anointed to heaven. Do mistaken ideas such as these cast doubt on whether Jesus was guiding those faithful ones by means of holy spirit?


    The deeper intention behind this composition in the "k" book is, to imply, that there is real solid "truth" about 1914, that the witnesses just did not discover it in time. of course, the whole thing starting with the talking snake is a fabrication, and discussing all these possibilities is WT's way of mind control.

    The creator of the mighty universe would have never let his reps mentally flounder about the event that exceeds in importance even the big bang creation , namely the beginning of the eternal rule of all he created.

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman

    . However, at that time they believed that Christ’s presence had begun in 1874
    Do mistaken ideas such as these -MSS

    There is no admission of error in doctrine in the above by the wt. WT has always said that CTR was off by timing and not by doctrine when challenged. Neither does the related WT study article referenced on this thread outright admits that wt HAS erred but only that wt can. Whether or not the wt has actually erred is left to the reader of the related article to conclude for himself.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit