So to clarify are you saying that when science proposes a theory, then one should try ones best to disprove it?
Absolutely. You would win a Nobel prize if you could disprove evolution or relativity.
Has history not taught as that most scientific theories are not quite right? If so then they are based on misunderstanding
Great question. Has it or has it not? You should look into that. What does that have to do with terrible questions?
However isn't that an assumption to assume a poster is being dishonest even if they have been corrected many times and still persist in the question. I am not saying it's an incorrect assumption, but I am sure many current scientific theories are a result of a scientist who refused to accept being corrected many times and persisted in his theory.
Why would it be an incorrect assumption? And that's not a theory, posting something you know to be untrue is what is called "dishonest".
p.s I am confused how on content Viviane got a dislike on her previous reply to mine.
Probably because someone clicked "Dislike".