Update to UK “Child Safeguarding Policy”

by wifibandit 44 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

• 

  Listener

  ByIn the case of any discussion with a child abuse victim, an elder will not be alone with the child but will involve another elder and the child’s parent(s), not including a parent who is the alleged abuser. If the child expresses to the elders discomfort in discussing the matter in the presence of a parent, and the parent agrees, then the child may be gently told that he or she may choose an adult companion other than a parent, with whom he or she feels comfortable speaking about the matter, to be present during the discussion.

  
  

  The victim is given no choice here, they are required to discuss all the worried details with the elders, not just one but two and more likely, three.

  They also state this earlier in the policy

  We believe that parents have the primary responsibility for the protection, safety, and instruction of their children. We do not separate children from their parents for the purpose of instruction.ii (Ephesians 6:4)

  
  

  But when it comes to dragging out all the sordid details the child can be separated from their parents.

  
  

  What happens if the child expresses discomfort or reluctance in speaking to the Elders and I imagine the majority of abused children would. Not one word is mentioned about this but rather the opposite, it is a given expectation. It is wrong and a form of abuse. It is sickening that a child is required to discuss sexually explicit details with inexperienced male Elders.
  
  
• 

  DATA-DOG

  They are beginning to call child abuse a crime, yet they still shift the responsibility to the parents. They are virtually blaming child abuse on parents. They prattle on and on about the role of the parents, easing the conscience of any Elder reading this fabulous piece of work.

  Yes, there are some terrible parents. One can be an abuser and one an enabler, but this is not always the case. The WTBTS wants to ignore their responsibility when they allow child predators into the congregations. I saw no mention of any instances where the WTBTS failed to warn parents about an abuser in their midst, or an mention of remorse for failing to warn parents.

  What about child-predator Elders who have been reappointed by the Holy Spirit, after "some years" have passed and they show "evidence of God's blessing" in their lives?? It seems the letter, although thoroughly legal, is missing some vital information....

  DD
• 

  wannaexit

  @ the Searcher could not have said it better myself.
  
• 

  blondie

  So the WTS prints this article but doesn't see the correlation between the sheep and the sick man and which is more important the law or love. Which is more important God's love of love or secular law that does not go against God's?

  jy chap. 32 p. 78-p. 79 par. 7

• What Is Lawful on the Sabbath?
• 
  

On another Sabbath, Jesus visits a synagogue, likely in Galilee. There he finds a man whose right hand is withered. (Luke 6:6) The scribes and the Pharisees are watching Jesus closely. Why? They reveal what their real intent is when they ask: “Is it lawful to cure on the Sabbath?”—Matthew 12:10.

The Jewish religious leaders believe that healing is lawful on the Sabbath only if life is in danger. Thus, for example, on the Sabbath it is unlawful to set a bone or bandage a sprain, conditions that are not life threatening. Clearly the scribes and the Pharisees are not questioning Jesus because they feel genuine concern for this poor man’s suffering. They are trying to find a pretext for condemning Jesus.

Jesus, however, knows their twisted reasoning. He realizes that they have adopted an extreme, unscriptural view of what constitutes a violation of the prohibition against doing work on the Sabbath. (Exodus 20:8-10) He has already faced such misplaced criticism of his good works. Now Jesus sets the stage for a dramatic confrontation by telling the man with the withered hand: “Get up and come to the center.”—Mark 3:3.

Turning to the scribes and the Pharisees, Jesus says: “If you have one sheep and that sheep falls into a pit on the Sabbath, is there a man among you who will not grab hold of it and lift it out?” (Matthew 12:11) A sheep represents a financial investment, so they would not leave it in the pit until the next day; it might die in the meantime and thus cause them loss. Besides, the Scriptures say: “The righteous one takes care of his domestic animals.”—Proverbs 12:10.

Drawing a reasonable parallel, Jesus continues: “How much more valuable is a man than a sheep! So it is lawful to do a fine thing on the Sabbath.” (Matthew 12:12) Accordingly, Jesus would not be violating the Sabbath by healing the man. The religious leaders are unable to refute such logical, compassionate reasoning. They just remain silent.