It has been well proven that DUI puts the drivers life in danger as well as others. They are more concerned with what they consider to be biblical drunkenness rather than the more serious issue of putting others in danger.
False. The legal definition of intoxication varies (as the cult said) and has nothing to with “putting others lives in danger”. Example: in the jurisdiction in which i live .08 is the legal limit... unless you have a cdl in which case .02 is the limit. Same person but different limit based on drivers license. Its arbitrary and designed as a “feel good” law, same as seat belt laws. Of course there HAS to be a frame work to discourage and/or punish driving under the influance of alcohol or drugs but the linits set are indeed arbitrary and purposely low to establish a threshold of non impairment. Someone at that legal limit wouldnt appear or act the least impaired.
Also why the hell do you think its the cult business in anyway whatsoever if someone is drunk, biblically or not? Why the hell does a religion have any say in anyway on this issue? Just wondering