Would GETTING *LAID* MORE OFTEN help NUTTERS ?

by Focus 16 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  Prisca

  Focus my dear man, I didn't "miss the plot", rather, you missed the sublety of my joke. Nevermind. Happy Christmas to you and yours.
• 

  Focus

  Would GETTING LAID more often help Nutters/Fanatics/Extremists get over their problems?

  avishai wrote:
  

  Anyone else in a cult that i can help in this manner, I am more than happy too.

  "Anyone"? "Anyone"????
  

  Somehow, I am not sure you have thought this one through properly, avishai.... you are not displaying enough of an "open mind" to the possibilities!

  For example, a notoriously verperted one (who has strayed far from God's Whoreganization) such as Vadis (with whom I deal with below) might suggest you could be called on to help some pretty interesting person(s) in this way...

  So, is it still "Anyone"?

  Who/what you have in mind, and the folk whom Vadis may well have in mind for you, might make for... ummm.... I'd love to say that I am at a loss for words, but I do not lie. I'll just say nothing and move on (no offense meant, M.S. avishai) to:

  Dear District Overbeer Valis,

  You know as well as I do that people that people could deleted until they were blue in the face and it still wouldn't change their attitudes, but if only for a few minutes or days.

  Generally so, and I defer to your experience in such things. I am but an innocent.

  BUT what if 'people' were still VIRGINS at the present time? Would then the likelihood of improvement, post causa, not then be higher? Have you truly explored all the issues?

  I also know the /answer to the/ specific question you asked

  So, what is the answer? How do you know you know it?

  and I can only say that if the people I consider nutcases

  Who? Which people???

  that post here ever did get laid, I'm not sure I would even care to know. *LOL*...

  While my feelings may well be much the same, I was talking about the possibilities for remote facilitation, if you get my low speed drift, rather than anything remotely voyeuristic (especially in the present confused state).

  I am instructed by a source physically not too far from Santa Claws herself (who lives in Lapland, and brings good things even to the undeserving or idiotic), that all is now possible in this new-fangled age, what with the IRS running dual-sex brothels (in Nevada, at least) and all that, and online creditcard-paid almost-instant delivery possible, right to "your" door (I am keeping well away from references to chimneys).

  Nothing too fancy would be needed in some cases, I imagine. Inexperience and froth makes even the Really, Really, Older Sister Class seem desirable.

  So, what would the specifications be, for whoever you may have in mind, Vadis? In terms of, say, gender, age, race?

  (Please omit Ministerial Servant avishai here, as I think he needs some R&R first, and having given the matter prayerful contemplation will, I am confident, withdraw his offer or .. whatever).

  Or, is there in some cases no call for this sort of assistance at all, as there may be possibilities for in-house fulfilment (spiritual, and otherwise) with a bit of encouragement and guidance?

  Over to you:

  Sincerely,
  District Overbeer

  Irreverently,

  --
  Focus
  (Speaking in general, and Anti-SPIRITUAL Pornography Class)

  Edited by - Focus on 15 December 2002 0:22:2

  Edited by - Englishman on 15 December 2002 6:37:52
• 

  Mary

  Seeing as Saddam Hussein probably has as many wives as King Solomon, and 56 children, and he's the biggest nut-bar in the world, I wouldn't say that getting laid helps fanatics no matter what religion they're in!!!
• 

  SpannerintheWorks

  Would GETTING LAID more often help Nutters/Fanatics/Extremists get over their problems?

  Depends. Depends if the N/F/E in question have a "problem" with being "LAID". If it is a problem,

  then obviously it will not help them by being "LAID" more often. If not, then at the very least it will

  be a diversion from being a N/F/E.

  Focus, I know you are probably driving at something, but I haven't, as yet, been able (due to time

  constraints) to look in to this further.

  I await your response...

  Spanner

  Edited by - SpannerintheWorks on 15 December 2002 13:52:4
• 

  wasasister

  In response to your rather provocative question, Most Excellent Focus:

  I sincerely believe most of the "Nutters" I have encountered recently receive their sexual release by engaging in orgiastic diatribes of hate-spewing vitriol. Their verbal ejaculate has sullied this board and is now being spilled from their infertile yet turgid minds in a more agreeable environment.

  I do take note, however, that emissions from these Nutters have not gone entirely unchallenged.

  Or, did you perhaps mean "getting laid" in the more violent sense, as in:

  "The Mafia informant was getting laid out on a slab..."

  Affectionately,

  Wasa

  PS: would like to communicate with you on a private matter. Is that possible?
• 

  Focus

  Hail, Mary! And forgive me in advance for what I am about to do:
  

  Seeing as Saddam Hussein

  1. But the said Mr Hussein was not posting on one or more "ex/anti-JW" discussion boards, right? Hence he is excluded by definition unless you have evidence that he was doing this posting. Explicitly: I am not seeking to help him. I cannot help him. A long while ago, some 'friends' of mine tried to help him, but they were unsuccessful.

  probably has as many wives as King Solomon, and 56 children,

  2. I would think that these qualities you mention makes him quite different from most people, and hence most unsuitable to be used as a sample of one from which propositions may be advanced to the whole relevant population. See 4.

  and he's the biggest nut-bar in the world,

  3. Respectfully, I disagree that he is a nut-bar. That is minimizing his crimes. Saddam is an evil, cruel, malevolent, despicable and calculating monster (there is a tiny sliver of mitigation in his childhood; but so was there for Master Schicklegruber), and the West was nuts not to put him out of action when they had just cause a decade ago when his misjudgement gave them the legal opportunity so to do - but he is far less of a nutter than was the Maniacal, Jew-Hating Nazi Monkey called Adolf Hitler. And Hitler was certainly somewhat sexually screwed up (among other things, resorting to a vey young niece), while it would appear that Saddam is not. In contrast to his ideological ancestor, Saddam is much more cynical, and does not risk everything for some insane, illogical ideological "cause". Saddam's only cause is Saddam. Also Saddam has held power for much longer than did the God of the neo-Nazis, and made fools of far more people (U.S. Presidents included). And he is still there, worse luck for all (especially the Iraqis).
  5. Did you miss any really fruity nut-bars far closer to home? Are you looking in the right places, Mary? Never look unless you are prepared to find, though. I say:
  FOLLOW THE HONEY!

  I wouldn't say

  4. This employs a common fallacy, often termed "Argument By Generalization". I am away from my reference material containing standardized definitions of these creatures, but take it from me, that means using the quality of an unrepresentative and/or overly small sample to draw a wide-ranging conclusion. As an example of the fallacy: "teejay is hilariously inconsistent, illogical and ignorant. Therefore I would say that most posters in JWD are hilariously inconsistent, illogical and ignorant". Given such truth of the first part as may or may not be evident, the second does not follow - which does not mean that it is necessarily not true; it just means that is not proven in the assertion. A wider sample is needed. Not two. NOT EVEN THREE! More! Many more!!!

  that getting laid helps fanatics no matter what religion they're in!!!

  5. Pray, Mary, where did I mention "religion"? Is only (or even mainly) religious nuttery that is observed on "ex/anti-JW" discussion boards? Nuttery, Fanaticism and Extremism are also commonly found in things other than what is termed "religion" in the primary lexicographic definition thereof. Of course, with fanatics that other thing may well become in essence a cult/religion, I concede readily.

  Thanks for joining in, Mary!

  Now, I see some other enterprising flies have been drawn into the honey... seeing something, maybe missing much. I will deal with all of them at length, but not at this minute. Please bear with me and follow this thread. wasa, you may create a throwaway email address and then mail it to: [email protected] with a polite request to relay such address on to me. Watch your mailbox a few days thereafter.

  I will soon place a relevant Parable in this thread, which speaks to the matter of knowing whether or not individuals need help, and what help that might be. Of course, it is all to do with: Information. I could not mention this till now, possibly because I did not know about it... those involved in the harvest work are of another Class, and have now ascended back to heaven as the saints they are.

  I now have some Moose and Squirrel to attend to, and a 'gator to wrassle. Keep this place bookmarked, please!

  --
  Focus
  (Who Writes For Those Possessing Discernment; others, kindly excuse. Class)
• 

  SYN

  I will soon place a relevant Parable in this thread, which speaks to the matter of knowing whether or not individuals need help, and what help that might be. Of course, it is all to do with: Information. I could not mention this till now, possibly because I did not know about it... those involved in the harvest work are of another Class, and have now ascended back to heaven as the saints they are.

  This thread is more than it appears to be at first glance. HMMMMMM.....