The Guardian: JWs Church says it will comply with mandatory reporting of child abuse

by AndersonsInfo 10 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • AndersonsInfo
    AndersonsInfo

    http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/aug/04/jehovahs-witness-church-says-it-will-comply-with-mandatory-reporting-of-child-abuse

    August 4, 2015

    Australian Associated Press

    The Jehovah’s Witness church says it will comply with mandatory reporting obligations when they learn about sexual abuse crimes against children in their congregation.

    A royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse has heard that the theocratic church records more than one child abuse allegation every month yet in 60 years has never reported them to police.

    In the second week of a hearing into the church’s handling of abuse incidents, the head of the community’s service desk, Rodney Spinks, acknowledged they dealt with matters internally and did not encourage reporting to police.

    The service desk under the auspices of the church’s legal entity, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society Australia, is the first point of contact for elders looking for advice on how to deal with child abuse reports.

    Spinks said the first issue addressed is the safety of the child, and elders are referred to Watchtower publications on the matter.

    They are also given generic advice based on a handbook that says they should never suggest not reporting the allegation to police.

    Spinks acknowledged they had not had a practice, “against the wishes of the victim or otherwise, to directly report to police”.

    The commission chair, Peter McClellan, pointed out there were mandatory reporting obligations when a crime had been committed.

    Spinks said he had been made aware of this in these hearings and the church would accept and comply with mandatory reporting, “regardless of our strongly held religious belief that individuals should have the right to decide what is done with that information”.

    He said when there were mandatory reporting requirements with some sort of uniformity across the country “we will happily and willingly comply”.

    McClellan pointed out that uniform laws were not yet in place and they would differ from state to state but they would impose “a criminal sanction on a person who knows [about an abuse crime] and does not report”.

    Spinks said he understood that.

    McClellan said the church needed to have a very good look maybe with the help of the church’s lawyers at what the law provides.

    The commissioner also pointed out that what the Jehovah’s Witnesses were doing was different to what other churches might be doing “because you might be taking allegations and resolving, as you see it, the truth of the allegation by reason of your process”.

    The commission has heard that the Jehovah’s Witness process is based on a biblical rule that the wrongdoing is only proven when there are two witnesses, and expect the abuse victim to confront the abuser.

  • RedPillPopper
    RedPillPopper

    He said when there were mandatory reporting requirements with some sort of uniformity across the country “we will happily and willingly comply”.

    But if there are NO "mandatory" requirements, its "business as usual"

  • Oubliette
    Oubliette

    The facts speak for themselves, JW/WT's own internal records document "more than one child abuse allegation every month yet in 60 years has never reported them to police."

    Not one single report in more than half a century with more than 1,000 opportunities to do the right thing. Never. Not once. This is one of the most stunningly spectacular failures I have ever seen!

  • blondie
    blondie
    No uniform mandatory reporting requirements in the US but the WTS still checks if a state has them or not before having the elders go forward in the US. Why don't they refuse unless there is a federal uniform mandatory reporting requirement?
  • sparrowdown
    sparrowdown

    The thing is Rodney Spinks is not in a postion to speak for the GB or Aus Branch for that matter.

    Any changes to WT practice and procedure or ammendments to the flockbook will come via HQ not Spinks.

  • ABibleStudent
    ABibleStudent

    If the Aussies changed their charitable/Tax laws to require that charities promote to their members to report child abuse and other serious felonies to the police before its legal department or risk its charity status being suspended or revoked, the WTBTS would probably rush to comply. JWs would hail it as New Light and praise Jehovah for his blessing!

    Peace be with you and everyone, who you love,

    Robert

  • Dumplin
    Dumplin

    "mcclellan pointed out that uniform laws were not yet in place and they would differ from state to state but they would impose a criminal sanction on a person who knows [about an abuse crime] and does not report.. spinks said he understood that..."

    So out of the 1006, have there been any crimes committed that will be pursued? (b/c i'd like to see Spinks locked up)

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    .....................................Image result for fraud alert

    ..........Image result for false advertising....Image result for scams

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Image result for if you believe that i`ve got a bridge to sell you

    JWs Church says it will comply with mandatory reporting of child abuse

  • DesirousOfChange
    DesirousOfChange

    If the Aussies changed their charitable/Tax laws to require that charities promote to their members to report child abuse and other serious felonies to the police before its legal department or risk its charity status being suspended or revoked, the WTBTS would probably rush to comply.

    You can bet your sweet azz on that!

    Doc

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    Not that this isn't good news but:

    The Jehovah’s Witness church says it will comply with mandatory reporting obligations when they learn about sexual abuse crimes against children in their congregation.

    That's so generous of them to be caught in such a mess and then agree to do what is now mandatory of them anyway. Do they want a parade held in their honor for this landmark decision?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit