The dilema of Uncle onion.

by uncle_onion 39 Replies latest jw friends

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    With all that poop to take care of, how could the Noah family have time to feed all those animals -- Farkel

    Why insist that the "Noah family" themselves were the ones that "took care of" the animal's waste? Are we to suppose that God hasn't the means Himself to dispose of a bunch of poop? Zap! ... poop all gone! See how simple that was to take care of ... made all the flies mad though.

    Yadirf

  • ICHING
    ICHING

    was the infant jesus ever conscious of his pre human existance whilst laying around in a dirty nappy?

    I-CHING

    Edited by - iching on 17 March 2001 7:32:56

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    So what was the point of the ark and the flood? Why didnt God just wipe it clean and start again? Why bother with the fuss of the flood? If you are going to use the miracle arguement, then anything is possible! -- Uncle Onion

    Either way of going about it is a miricle, isn't it? Whether by Flood, or by "just wiping it clean" as you say ... a miricle both ways.

    Too, with God being the Boss of the universe, can't He do as He pleases? Does He have to answer to us as to why, for example, He didn't create Eve in such a way so that Adam wouldn't have to sacrifice one of his ribs? And a person could just as well ask why didn't God create us with a third hand? I've seen many a time where a third hand would've been right handy. Personally, I'm satisfied with God's choice, both in the manner in which He brought an end to the world of Noah's day, and the fact that I only have two hands.

    Yadirf

    Edited by - Yadirf on 17 March 2001 7:11:10

    Edited by - Yadirf on 17 March 2001 7:13:15

  • ICHING
    ICHING
    why didn't God create us with a third hand? I've seen many a time where a third hand would've been right handy.

    yea i agree -

    especially during sex.

    I-CHING

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    was the infant jesus ever conscious of his pre human existance whilst laying around in a dirty nappy? -- ICHING

    Don't you reckon that if he had been, wouldn't he have been able to TALK as well? So, I'd say no, he wasn't aware of such a thing at that point in his life ... he must have been just a normal infant. Do we outselves have any remembrance of having been in the womb of our mothers? Of course not ... and neither did Jesus.

    Yadirf

  • Yadirf
    Yadirf
    yea i agree - especially during sex. -- ICHING

    What would someone who can't even spell "yeah" correctly know about the pleasures of an orgasm? Perhaps you should apply the two hands you do have to the task of learning kindergarten words ... and if you do, try real hard to take your mind off your private parts ... who knows, you might discover something besides your favorite playtoy.

    Yadirf

    Edited by - Yadirf on 17 March 2001 8:8:58

  • aChristian
    aChristian

    : how was Noah able to save all the animals even the bugs? There was no food mommy for sooo long? Did they have refrigerators? or coolers? How did the dove find a tree in one week when it takes so long for trees to grow?

    Mommy,

    I'd recommend you read my post in this same thread above beginning, "Hi Unc."

    Mike

  • ICHING
    ICHING

    yadirf -

    try real hard to take your mind off your private parts ... who knows, you might discover something besides your favorite playtoy

    you're only jealous you're not having any fun with your playtoy by the sound of things.

    i-ching

  • ICHING
  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    aChristian, congrats, you get the db's "Round peg in a Square Hole" award for all of eternity in return for your incredible resculpting and mind bending reworking of the flood account.

    In the end, God will do just exactly what you say He will do, and God will be just exactly who you say He will be.

    Evidently, it was the same for the Bible writers.

    God just can't get a word in edgewise, with some of you yackin' for him.

    Yardif, if the flood account is a messege, a warning, from God Himself; why does that messege include killing innocent children for their parents sins? Why does that messege include trying (and succeeding) in making it look, to the informed human eye, as if the whole thing never happened?

    I'm getting to the point where it seems to me that belief in a worldwide flood, at that point in history, is about like believing that man has not been to the moon.

    Edited by - SixofNine on 17 March 2001 11:59:55

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit