Found this on their official website

by SpiceItUp 14 Replies latest jw friends

  • SpiceItUp
    SpiceItUp

    https://watch001.securesites.com/library/g/1993/10/8a/article_02.htm

    Tragically, adult society often unwittingly collaborates with child abusers. How so? By refusing to be aware of this danger, by fostering a hush-hush attitude about it, by believing oft-repeated myths. Ignorance, misinformation, and silence give safe haven to abusers, not their victims.
    So are they saying here that they are "unwittingly collaborates"?

    https://watch001.securesites.com/library/g/1993/10/8a/diagram_01.htm

    Misconception: Children fantasize or lie about sexual abuse.

    Under normal circumstances children lack the experience or sophistication in sexual matters to invent explicit claims of abuse, although some small children may become confused about details. Even the most skeptical of researchers agree that most claims of abuse are valid. Consider the book Sex Abuse Hysteria—Salem Witch Trials Revisited, which focuses on false claims of abuse.* This book admits: "Genuine sex abuse of children is widespread and the vast majority of sex abuse allegations of children . . . are likely to be justified (perhaps 95% or more)." Children find it enormously difficult to report abuse. When they do lie about abuse, it is most often to deny that it happened even though it actually did.

    Hmmmm....If most children don't lie about the abuse why the need for two witnesses.

    Misconception: Children are seductive and frequently bring the abuse on themselves by their conduct.

    This notion is particularly warped, since, in effect, it blames the victim for the abuse. Children have no real concept of sexuality. They have no idea of what such activity implies or of how it will change them. They are therefore incapable of consenting to it in any meaningful way. It is the abuser, and the abuser alone, who bears the blame for the abuse.—Compare Luke 11:11, 12.

    If this is the case then why do they always ask the victim what they were wearing and did they scream etc.

    Misconception: When children disclose abuse, parents should teach them to refrain from talking about it and to 'put it behind them.'

    Who is best served if the child keeps silent about the abuse? Is it not the abuser? In fact, studies have shown that denial with emotional suppression may be the least effective way to deal with the trauma of abuse. Of the nine coping methods used by one group of adult survivors studied in England, the ones who denied, avoided, or suppressed the issue suffered the greater emotional maladjustment and distress in adult life. If you experienced a terrifying assault, would you want to be told not to talk about it? Why tell a child such a thing? Allowing the child the normal reaction to such a terrible event, such as grief, anger, mourning, will give him the opportunity eventually to put the abuse in the past.

    Oh this one is a dooozy! Do I even need to make a comment.
  • Mister Biggs
    Mister Biggs

    SpiceItUp is bringing it to the table!!!

    Good research!

    Keep it up.

    Biggs.

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    Good work Spice. It is mind-boggling how the WTS can say such things, and then practice just the opposite ... only a cult of their caliber can possible be so wreckless.

  • belbab
    belbab

    Spice,

    Great job of splicing.

    By their own words they are demonstrating their guilt.

    They are unwitting collaborators

    belbab

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    It is not up to the Watchtower to give a report on the number of sexual abuse cases that were handled properly. That is no ones business.

    If a person feels that their case was not handled properly they ought to seek all remedies available to them.

    Silent Lambs is an enemy of the Watchtower and it is appropriate for the Watchtower to treat them as such. The Watchtower certainly appear ready for the long haul on this issue. They have shifted their assets to minimize financial hits. They have made an organizational statement concerning their policy. The vast majority of JW's feel safe in their brotherhood.

    The Watchtower isn't going to dance to Bill Bowens tune. The public only has a limited interest in JW's. They are much more interested in the Catholic Church. Dateline was a one-trick pony. If Dateline did an ongoing series on JW's they would lose their share of the audience.

  • SpiceItUp
    SpiceItUp
    The public only has a limited interest in JW's. They are much more interested in the Catholic Church.

    This may be true but when you bring up an issue of child abuse and molestation it gets attention. I think the JW's will be under just as much scrutiny as the Catholic Church in the future. After all why did they originally get interested in the Catholics. Was it because of the robes they wear. I think not!

  • Simon
    Simon

    So what does that say about them being 'gods fantastic organisation'?

    It tells me that they are a bunch of perv serving old farts just looking out for their own interests!

    "Er, God! ... if you're up there ... do you have a clue or are you just as incompetent and innefectual as the people you appoint?"

  • SYN
    SYN

    I particularly loved the bit where the abused child has to tell the Elders what the abuser did, in front of the abuser! And usually in excruciating detail too! Can there be anything more horrible?

    They've been digging in the Euphrates Valley and have uncovered a layer of agrarian culture 8,000 years old, and an older caveman culture. Recently, they reached another layer of fused green glass.

  • Farkel
    Farkel

    : Silent Lambs is an enemy of the Watchtower the Watchtower's cover-up of child-rape and it is appropriate in their customary character for the Watchtower to treat them as such.

    Farkel

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    Farkel:

    Do you understand the difference between "cover-up" and non-disclosure?

    My biggest problem with the Watchtower is idiots like Bill Bowen who blab to their wives about personal confessions. In the dateline program their was the claim of "confidentiality of confession".

    JW Elders almost universally blab - so forget about confidentiality. At least priests don't have wives to talk to.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit