Its like someone said Jesus did not like the Jewish leaders interpretation of the law. Yet the same thing can be said for the GB interpretation of the abstaining from blood. Leviticus makes it clear that one is to pour out the blood of an animal he killed in respect for the like he took, it says so three times in chapter 17 and then says its ok to eat blood of an animal whose life you did not take. Its plain and simple, when read in context, until the JW's got a hold of it.