Krauss is an atheist activist and self-described antitheist. Hence his science is biased. Being an antitheist means he's anti God.
Anyone disagree?
Kate xx
Lawrence Krauss
by KateWild 42 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
KateWild
Cool 50 hits and everyone agrees with me. Thought so. Thanks guys Kate xx
-
Designer Stubble
Krauss is a great scientist and uses factual matters. Of course he knows that the concept of God is complete hogwash, but doubt it has any impact on his research.
-
LostGeneration
False premise.
Any examples you can provide of his science being wrong because of his bias?
-
neverendingjourney
Albert Einstein was an anti-unicornist, therefore his science was biased.
-
cofty
Please provide a specific example.
-
KateWild
Any examples you can provide of his science being wrong because of his bias?-LG
Ohh some took the bait
I don't think his science would be wrong, but I question his credibility as an author and role model. I have never read any of his books, but I would only read them to critisise his conclusions about God, so in all fairness I am bias too.
We are all bias to some degree aren't we?
Kate xx
-
cofty
You said ...
"his science is biased"
Are you withdrawing that accusation now?
-
kneehighmiah
Ive met him before he was a professor at my university.
-
KateWild
Are you withdrawing that accusation now?- cofty
I will rephrase, his conclusions based on his science are biased. He admits to being anti-God. Science is only biased when scientists fudge results to meet their agenda, if a scientist has no agenda the results are not going to get fudged.
I don't think Krauss has ever been caught falsifying results. I am not making this accusation. If you want me to read "A universe from Nothing" I might try and read it with an open mind. I will see if the library have a copy.
Kate xx