But you did not present a consistent growth rate, you simply added 1 member to each congregation. And then made the rather obvious observation that 1 added to a smaller number represents a larger percentage increase than 1 added to a larger number. Why you were adding 1 to each group or what you think it shows was not explained. I think you are very confused about what you are doing.
In other examples given previously, I didn't just add one. I was demonstrating a different aspect of the larger point each time. If you can't extrapolate more complicated scenarios from the simpler examples I've given, or grasp the fact that the JW reckoning is skewed in favour of inflated growth rates, I couldn't be bothered explaining it to you any further.