My attempt at correcting a heavily biased Wiki article

by cedars 33 Replies latest watchtower child-abuse

  • mind blown
    mind blown

    Though Wikipedia is not a source considered for serious research, the majority of JWs do not research info the WTS sweeps under the carpet. And since Wiki is rather legit in it's own right, JW's cannot deny what's staring them in the face. Also JW's feel if it's in print as Wiki (for all to see) and the WTS hasn't sued, there must be some truth as to what they're reading........

    I've used Wiki many times to point things out to my family, as they will not look at any apostate info........

    Thanx again, Cedars!

  • Refriedtruth
    Refriedtruth

    Lets keep a vigil on about a dozen heavily edited Watchtower Wiki pages. Google Jehovah's Witneses to find

  • Band on the Run
    Band on the Run

    Now we have to see if a Witness reverts the article.

  • Refriedtruth
    Refriedtruth

    Monthly bump for all your techies that can keep the vigil on Wiki accuracy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit