Consider the implication of being a CREATED human as opposed to an evolved human.
The nature a created human has is GIVEN due to intentionality. The creator wills that nature upon the creature.
What escape from nature is there?
To desire to be other than what you are when what you are is god-determined has enormous importance to our understanding.
Nothing is anything without the disambiguation of a "nature".
(Note: read the next sentence slowly and thoughtfully....)
Otherwise everything is everything instead of something and ultimately THE thing which isn't everything else.
Now if that sounds like gobblety-gook it's only because you didn't bother to read it carefully.
What a human is follows the nature of what it is to be human.
It cannot be other.
(Oh come on!! Just stop and pay attention. Read carefully. Don't give up so fast!)
The biblical religious story that imposes a condition of ambitious greed on humanity is a curious one, indeed.
Man desires to be LIKE god for a reason: Knowledge. After all, the tree upon which the fruit grows is the Tree of Knowledge. Of what?
Knowledge is not a juice or a pulp but an experienced reality.
Virginity is not ignorance of the sex act. Virginity is ignorance of the experience of the sex act.
Man's nature is not one of compliant ignorance. Homo sapien means something. See that "sapien"? What does it mean? It means: WISE.
Ignorance of experience is not wise.
A created being has no history.
A created being has no family.
A created being merely exists as the thing made; no better and no worse.
But, the other alternative is the one Evolution describes as a "work in progress". Progress is always defined as survival in the face of change.
Man must eat. Eating poison is not wise. Experiencing death is not knowledge because that knowledge cannot be useful for survival.
Everything that the evolved man IS (the NATURE of man) is a RESULT of millions of survivals in an unbroken chain of experience.
For lower animals the "experience" is retained as instinct.
For homo sapien it is not. WHY?
How useful is instinct for survival that obviously worked for ancestors passing on a gene? Success literally BREEDS success.
What does an instinctive creature lack? The skill to see itself recursively as improvable by choice.
Homo sapien is free of instinct and has broken free of "determined" patterns of behavior only in so far as man innovates.
The self-awareness of man's innovation begins with the idea that he is superior on purpose.
What has man innovated for himself? The imagination to see himself as willed into existence as a Free creature whose source is a caring God.