What the CO sends to the society! Your thoughts...

by MC RubberMallet 30 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • MC RubberMallet
    MC RubberMallet

    Is that a fact?

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    it must be, u just read it on the internet.

    Joking aside, that is the rumour that circulated on this website.

  • MC RubberMallet
    MC RubberMallet

    They should be worrying how to get the good news out more effectively instead of damage control (Hoping they read this). Jesus didn't care about this stuff. He just preached. Christlike, eh?

  • shopaholic

    Didn't they use to report the number of inactive pubs, number of DA'd and DF'd in the congragation's territory?

  • wha happened?
    wha happened?

    There are no inactive, DA'd, DF'd publishers in your territory. Those are apostates and they don't count them

  • Bonnie_Clyde

    Nothing about looking after the needs of the sick, elderly, widows, children or those who have fallen on hard times. Nothing about manifesting love to one another.

    Just numbers, territory coverage, appearance of Kingdom Hall, and problems in the congregation.

  • stuckinamovement

    It's legit. That is exactly the form used in the co report to the branch. Notice how it is all about numbers....


  • AwareBeing

    According to that form; we must have been high on their radar,

    since we kept moving to different halls to get away from one abusive elder body and pioneer carnies after another!

    In the end; it was apparent that the head was also corrupt, and we left for good.

  • bats in the belfry
    bats in the belfry

    ... and, dear CO:

    When filling out the S-303-E form, remember please, all the queries and check boxes are scripture-based.

  • Phizzy

    Why would the branch need all these details if Jehovah's Witnesses are not their direct agents ? They will deny any direct connection if money/litigation is involved, but they want a detailed report such as this.

    I bet 99.9% of C.O's put in what the Soc. wants to hear, not anything near the truth.

    I remember one candid C.O , we asked him if particular concerns of the appointed men would go "back down the line" , he shook his head sadly and said "No".

Share this