Perhaps the "hidden" tragedy lying quietly beneath everyone's arguments is simply this; the cyclical debating of the nature/form of Jesus and/or God when all you have available are the writings of ancient men. How can any reasonable conclusions be drawn from unreliable sources?
Ancient men plagued with fear and superstition of the unknown present their collective and "recollective" accounts, opinions and dreams about the "Creator/Supreme Being (s)" and here thousands of years later intelligent humans are still debating the accuracy and splitting hairs over details.
Imagine having used "Buck Rogers" as your model for explaining outer space, the future and technology. How would your conclusions appear?