This is the bizzy bee response to my argument:
:Farkel, I am committed to the tall, handsome, well-to-do Mr Bee.
Mr. Bee is tall, handsome and rich. GREAT argument.
:So you really must stop obsessing about me. It can never bee.
I made an argument, and you turned that into obsessing about you. Curious at best. Crazy at worst.
: Lust for me from afar if you must, but otherwise, try to control yourself.
How silly is that? Let's revisit your comments which made me make my argument and then we can reveal how crazy you really are, shall we?
:Hmmm....I don't think so, but I'm not surprised that such an urban legend might spring up among Witnesses.
Hmmm.... Notice the segue from Bizzy saying she doesn't "think so" to drawing the conclusion that therefore it is "an urban legend" without a single bit of transition or evidence.
It's nice to know that if Bizzy Bee doesn't "think" something is true then it MUST be an urban legend.
Now, this is not about whether David Nelson was or wasn't influenced by JWs. NO! This is all about how Bizzy Bee thinks and makes conclusions.
And it reveals a lot about her thinking abilities. Of course, I use the term "thinking abilities" pejoratively here. Think "rocks" and "ferns." And then think "dumber than that."
So, bizzy bee, where you get from that the I "lust" after your fat ass and saggy boobs and pimply face and stupid brain?