Flood Legends "Proof" of Global Flood...

by AlanF 61 Replies latest jw friends

  • Fredhall
    Fredhall

    AlanF,

    If you want to keep up, then you better move fast. Because I'm a fast cat.

  • anewperson
    anewperson

    Alan, Egypt did have a Flood legend which a priest told the Greek Solon, i.e. that Atlantis was distroyed by floods & volcanic eruptions. You've hinged much of your argument on the idea that Egypt had no such flood tradition which weakens the thesis.

    The Bible itself does not say if or if not the whole planet was covered by water but that all the "earth" was covered and earth can refer to just the land area under discussion rather than the entire planet.

    That the Watchtower Society errs in making rigid statements that come back to haunt them I do not debate. But I do wish to point out these weak points in your overall thesis (i.e. Watchtower being unsound on many points of science) so that you can strengthen it.

  • VM44
    VM44

    Alan, I am very glad you started this thread.
    I must get a copy of that March 1, 2002 Watchtower!

    Isaac Newton Vail, the originator of the "Earth's Annular
    Ring" or "Cloud Canopy" idea for the Great Flood is also
    credited as the first to come up with the "anthropological"
    argument for a worldwide flood.

    Vail goes into the myths of various cultures in his book,
    "The Earth's Annular System" (1912) and "The Misread Record"
    (1921).

    Here is what is written on the first page of "The Misread Record"

    "Being an Explanation of the Annular Theory of the
    Formation of the Earth, with Special Reference to the Flood
    and the Legends and Folk Lore of Ancient Races."

    The Watchtower used to endorse fully Vail's idea. There were
    references to Vailian rings and cloud canopies in "The Photodrama
    of Creation" (1914), the "Creation" book (1927), and in "The Truth Shall Make you Free" (1943). There is indication that Vail's
    ideas are also in the "Paradise Lost" book (1958) although Vail
    is not mentioned by name in that book.

    Rutherford wrote in the "Creation" book that "It seems to have
    been the plan of Jehovah God to begin the increase of light upon
    his great work for the benefit of man about the year 1874 A.D.
    It was in that yearthat Isaac N. Vail first published a pamphlet entitled 'The Earth's Annular System'." [page 29]

    Vail's ideas were never accepted by mainstream astronomers or
    geologists, mainly because the ideas violated basic physics!
    In all of the drawings of the cloud canopy depicted in Vail's
    books, the canopy is shown to be revolving around the axis of
    the earth, much like a cylinder rotating about an axis.

    Planetary gases orbiting about a gravitational body would not
    behave like that, but would rather spread out and form a flat
    disk like ring, such as we see in the rings orbiting the planet Saturn.

    I think Vail must have known he had problems with the physics
    involved. This is why he spent more pages in his books talking
    about old legends and myths than about the mechanics of orbiting
    rings.

    The Watchtower has not mentioned Vail in any books or magazines
    for decades, but is still showing the influence of Vail's thinking
    by continuing with the "myths and legends" Flood argument.

    --VM44

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    anewperson wrote:

    : Alan, Egypt did have a Flood legend which a priest told the Greek Solon, i.e. that Atlantis was distroyed by floods & volcanic eruptions. You've hinged much of your argument on the idea that Egypt had no such flood tradition which weakens the thesis.

    You prove that a little knowledge is dangerous, but not as dangerous as full knowledge.

    The fact is that Egypt had no Flood legend of its own. What the Egyptian priest supposedly told the Greek Solon was that the particular flood that Solon tried to describe to the priest was the so-called "Deluge of Deukalion". This deluge was, according to the priest, only the last in a series of catastrophes that the Egyptians had records of. How do we know about this story about Solon and the Egyptian priest? Through the Greek philosopher Plato. So this story is Greek, not Egyptian. Furthermore, we have a number of stories of "Deukalion's Deluge", and they obviously undergo an evolution over time, becoming more and more like the Biblical story of Noah's Flood. So we have here a demonstrable example of how an ancient legend could evolve into something like the present Biblical legend. Finally, we note that "Deukalion's Deluge" was just one of several flood legends that the Greeks had.

    The above material was taken from Dorothy Vitaliano's Legends of the Earth: Their Geologic Origins (Indiana Universtiy Press, 1973).

    : The Bible itself does not say if or if not the whole planet was covered by water but that all the "earth" was covered and earth can refer to just the land area under discussion rather than the entire planet.

    So what? If you carefully read what I wrote, you'll find that I only talked about global Flood legends. Neither the Greek legend nor what Plato said Solon said the Egyptian priest said has anything to do with a global flood.

    : That the Watchtower Society errs in making rigid statements that come back to haunt them I do not debate. But I do wish to point out these weak points in your overall thesis (i.e. Watchtower being unsound on many points of science) so that you can strengthen it.

    What I have written is based on solid references, which anyone can verify by going to a good library. If there is enough interest and I have time later (I'm about to take my daughter out for a long driving lesson) I'll type in some of the information that Vitaliano gives.

    AlanF

  • anewperson
    anewperson

    Alan I will look into it but believe the Atlantis legend and the Flood of Deukalion were separate legends. And the way this goes is that Plato recounts that Solon mentioned the Deukalion flood to an Egyptian priest who said that even Deukalion's flood was predated by huge floods and then proceded to give the story of Atlantis. From Egypt via Solon the story of Atlantis came to Greece. So it indeed is Egyptian in origin.

    As we go into 2002 growing scientific concensus is that there was a cataclysmic regional flood in the area pinpointed by the Bible and this regional flood in turn impacted the rest of the planet, hence was global in impact though localized in origin. I do hope you are respectful of scientists and scholars like these.

    Go to the following link and you will learn about midway down of
    Ray Ballard whom National Geographic calls its resident-explorer who believes and has evidence that there was a massive influx of water from the Mediterranean into the Black Sea Basin
    http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lectures/seattle_events.html
    We'll be hearing more from him and other scientists in the future.
    Search a little and you'll find lots of other links about Ballard et al.

    Further, Alan, the Bible Scholar Michael Sanders has noted for example that settlement of early Sumeria in the northern plain of the Tigres and Euphrates occurred after the Black Sea Flood. The water to fill the Black Sea Basin would have lowered the oceans around the world by a foot, which shows how the regional flood was also global. http://ancienthistory.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.biblemysteries.com/library/blacksea/

    In surfing I came across the following which argues that Cuba may have been what was actually meant by Atlantis,

    http://www.andrewcollins.net/page/secretloc/cubapoints.htm

    and in recent weeks some scientists found actual evidence that an unknown ancient civilization was indeed submerged just off the coast of Cuba. Although I don't have that link handy I do recall someone else recently posted about it on this very board, and if you search for it a little with key words like Lost, Civilization, Cuba you should find it.

    The points in favour of Cuba being Atlantis are listed as:

    Plato says that Atlantis was an island landmass which lay in the Atlantic Ocean beyond which was a series of `other lands' that enabled `voyagers' from his own world to reach the `opposite continent'. This statement perfectly describes the geographical relationship between Cuba and both the Bahamas and the Mid-Caribbean island group which have been used since ancient times as stepping stones to reach the American mainland.

    Plato tells us that Atlantis possessed a large fertile plain protected from cold northerly winds by mountain ranges. This precisely describes Cuba's great western plain, between Havana and Pinar del Río, shielded between November and February each year from `les nortes', the cold northerly winds which come in from the eastern United States, by the Cord de Guaniguanico mountain range.

    Plato tells us that Atlantis was drowned during earthquakes and floods which occurred during one terrible night and a day. Cuba's great plain was partially drowned following the rise in sea level brought about by the melting of the ice at end of the glacial age, c. 8000 BC. Some 500 years earlier, Cuba - along the rest of the Antilles - would have been devastated by earthquakes and tsunamis following the fragmentation and multiple impacts of a comet which devastated the Western Hemisphere in c. 8600-8500 BC. The drowned portion of the plain now lies beneath the Bay of Batabanó and once stretched as far as the Isla de Juventus (Isle of Youth).

    Over 60 sites of possible archaeological interest have been noted on the former Bahaman landmass, now known to marine geologists as the Great Bahama Bank. By far the greatest accumulation of sites cluster on its south-west edge close to Cay Guinchos, Diamond Point and Cay Lobos facing out towards the northern coast of Cuba. If these curious features do turn to be of artificial construction then it means that the proposed former Bahaman culture was integrally linked with the Cuban mainland. Before the waters rose up after the end of the last Ice Age only the Old Bahama Channel would have separated Cuba from the Bahaman landmass.

    The memory of an Atlantic island called Atlantis which lay in the Far West would appear to derive from Iberic Phoenician, and later Carthaginian, sea-journeys to the western Atlantic seaboard from around 1200 BC onwards. After the fall of Carthage in 147 BC the former Carthaginian territories were occupied by seafaring Berber tribes who as the Moors invaded Spain in the eighth century AD. They reintroduced the concept of a western isle lying far out in the ocean and called it Antilia, a name derived from the same Semitic word root as Atlantis showing their common origin. Geographers have identified Antillia as Cuba, while the appearance of Antilia on medieval maps matches very well a truncated form of Cuba shown on the Turkish Piri Reis map of 1513. Professor Charles Hapgood of Keene University determined that this nautical chart was derived originally from a patchwork of pre-Columbian source maps, suggesting a maritime knowledge of Cuba before the time of the Conquest.

    The founding families of various Central American cultures, as well as great civilisers such as Quetzalcoatl and Votan, were said to have come from an island set in the waters located in an easterly direction. Unquestionably it was one of the Caribbean islands, and various traditions record that the island in question was Cuba. The blood-red earth which dominates its western plain accounts for the name given to Quetzalcoatl's original homeland which was Huehue Tlapallan, the `old, old red land'. The other names given to this homeland were Tulan, a word which can be shown to have the same root as Atlantis.

    Located on the Mesoamerican island homeland was a place of emergence of the human race known as the Seven Caves. The only location in the Caribbean which appears to fit its description is Ceuva # 1 of the `seven caves' complex at Punta del Este on Cuba's Isle of Youth. Its walls are adorned which dozens of petroglyphs of a celestial nature drawn many thousands of years ago.

    Occasionally the seven tribes whose ancestors had emerged from the Seven Caves were seen as having constructed Seven Cities, arguably the root behind the Portuguese medieval belief in the existence of Seven Cities on the island of Antilia, the medieval form of Atlantis.

    In the eighteenth century Friar Ramon de Ordoñez y Aguilar, canon of the cathedral town of Ciudad-Réal in Chiapas, told the odyssey of a Central American culture hero named Votan who came out of the east from a land called Valum Chivim and settled on an island named Valum Votan, identified as Cuba, before journeying on to the Yucatán. Andrew Collins demonstrates how Votan is the memory of a Bronze Age Iberic Phoenician seafarer who made transatlantic voyages as early as 2000 BC. A knowledge of Valum Votan's, or Cuba's, topography and catastrophe legends thus entered the classical world prior to the age of Plato. It was from such knowledge, particularly a description of Cuba's western plain, its fertility, its occupation by Iberic Phoenicians and Carthaginians, and the memory of a former great cataclysm which divided the Caribbean into individual islands, that Plato constructed his Atlantis account. A near contemporary writer known as pseudo-Aristotle also wrote about a similar island paradise in his work entitled On Marvellous Things Heard. C. 300 BC.

    Cuba can also be identified as one of the Islands of the Hesperides, which the Roman geographer Statius Sebosus (as recorded by Pliny the Elder and Solinus) stated lay 40 days' sail beyond the Gorgades, an ancient name for the Cape Verde islands. It took Christopher Columbus 33 days to sail between the Cape Verdes and Barbados in the Caribbean on his third voyage to the New World in 1498. Like Atlantis, the concept of the Hesperides, the islands of the Far West, is considered to be of Phoenician origin.

    Top Italian scientist Emilio Spedicato, Professor of Operations Research, at Bergamo University has recently proposed that the island of Hispaniola, Cuba's easterly neighbor, was Plato's Atlantis. Yet having reviewed Andrew Collins' evidence in favour of Cuba being Atlantis he now sees it `as a very good candidate …only archaeological work will perhaps solve the riddle.'

    After and only after reading the foregoing, please go back to your previous comments and make the appropriate reassessments. Knowledge is important but so are courtesy, kindness and humility with a lack of quickness to take umbrage.

  • patio34
    patio34

    Forgive me for offering this without verifying it, but i no longer have the book "Middle Eastern Mythology & the Bible," as it was a library book and is out of print.

    However, it made the point that ancient Sumer, the 1st nation with writing had a flood myth that is probably the source of the Noah's flood. And also, since they lived in the fertile crescent area between two rivers, it DID flood often and flood tales were logical.

    Also, of interest to note is that Abraham, the father of the Jews, was from Ur, which was a large city-state of Sumer.

    Pat

  • anewperson
    anewperson

    I'd still like to hear from Alan regarding my rejoinder.

  • iggy
    iggy

    Anewperson it is interesting to read your long reply to alanf.
    I have been trying to piece together the ancient history surrounding the flood for a while and every now and then a bit more is added to the story.
    One day, when scientists do a lot more research, the whole truth will be able to be pieced together.
    Alanf and others while knowing that science is still in the process of discovery, talks on some subjects as though all the evidence is in.
    Yet on other subjects the answer is that science will find the answer eventually.
    I think we can all use the last argument and should not be jumping to hasty conclusions in areas which are still under investigation.
    I hope by what I said that I have not taken away our right to faith in God's word.
    Iggy

  • proplog2
    proplog2

    Discovering that the Noachian flood never happened was the defining moment in my retreat from Watchtowerism. I was 40 years old. When the reality hit me I just curled up on the floor and sobbed. When I got up on my feet I felt a tremendous sense of liberation. I could no longer take much of the bible seriously.

    For the average person it is much easier to disprove the flood than to disprove evolution.

    Don't throw out the Baby with the flood-water!!!

  • uncle jimbo
    uncle jimbo

    There is probably was a single event that served as the genesis for most of the flood legends (including Noah's in the Bible). But, it was probably ONLY a very, very bad local flood.

    Check out:
    http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_noah.htm

    It's presents a fascinating theory (backed up by solid archilogical and scientific evidence) of a catastrophic rise in the level of the Black Sea at the end of the last Ice Age (around 7500 yrs ago).

    Personally, I think this explains most of what happened. Moses plagerizing (err, borrowing heavily from) the Epic of Gilgamesh explains the rest.

    check out:
    http://www.icr.org/pubs/imp/imp-285.htm

    on that page, you'll find a comparison listing that won't be in too many Watchtower's anytime soon!

    uncy

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit