by wannabefree 15 Replies latest watchtower bible
Probably as suggested a 'Robert King' type, or perhaps the real article.
Around here we have folks called 'jerked over Amish' - meaning they got their roots in the Amish faith, then left to join another religion. I suspect this person is a 'jerked over JW'. [Please note that I did not say 'jerking off JW', as that is an oxymoron supposedly].
Jeff
If they can find the time they will also help me to add a FORUM to the website in the autumn of 2008.
LOL
That would have been a hoot if it had happened.
"My" visiting elder who I have running around trying to find authoritative, independant academics who support the 607 dogma was thrilled to find screeds of info. by Rolf Furuli.
When I showed him that Furuli is a Norwegian Witness he was.....surprised and crestfallen.
You've probably got another Witness who hides his affilliation.
I'm still waiting too.......................
edited to add..Yep, I've looked over the site. Everything ticks the boxes for J.W. trying to use the wool-pulling technique.
aqwsed... thanks for supplying those links, they are certainly helpful for anybody coming across this thread who is not aware of the 607 issue ... personally, I have no question about 607bce (special thanks to jwfacts.com and Gentile Times Reconsidered), I just was surprised to find a site that didn't seem to be a Witness who was also pointing to 607 as the date for Jerusalem's destruction.
Think Perimeno is pissed that the term "Robert King type" is being used instead of "Perimeno type"? LoL
