God is not a good Samaritan

by peacedog 79 Replies latest jw friends

  • EndofMysteries

    PS - that is true....what happens when man is able to defy that for himself, and then man takes it upon himself for 'population control' of humans?

    Think of it as simple math, the lifespan of humans, the population, how many humans our 'society' can support as it currently operates, and how many humans the 'earth' can support, and the birthrate.

    We are already pass the how many our current 'society' can support. (meaning how money, trade, etc, does not get adequate food to the entire world's population) The earth can support it, but not our current way of doing things. Hence why many starve to death each year.

    As for being immortal.....flesh is not immortal. "If" we have a spirit in us, whose memory is blocked to experience human life, and our body is just a 'vessel' then we could be. OR also if being resurrected as a spirit vs a fleshly life.

  • PSacramento
    Tell that to the cancer patient. Or the alzheimer's sufferer. Or the person suffering from anxiety disorders or depression. Or the child born with fetal alcohol syndrome. Is their suffering self-inflicted? God walks past these people every day....

    Those are all horrible diseases, no doubt and we don't know enough about them to knwo where they come from, what causes them and how to cure them.

    Except the fetal alcohol syndrome one or cancer from smoking for example and I agree that it would be great if God would do something about those things and we can argue forever how if half the money that goes into armament or some other crap, went into finding a cure to these things that we probably would have one by now, but that still leaves us with the questionof why God doesn't do soemthing directly.

    Truth be it said, I don't KNOW why, all we can do is speculate and give opinions.

    I never asked Jesus why God doesn't fix what we CAN'T fix, maybe part of me doesn't wanna knwo the answer...

  • EndofMysteries

    Cancer patient - HOW did they get the cancer? If it was not due to any human chemicals, or unnatural means in which we live, then also consider most of our food is dead. Just processed, meat, fruit and veggies before ripe and w/ pesticides, etc.

    One thing I noticed in reading the bible.........that farming they HAD to give the land a rest / sabbath. I found it VERY interesting that in farming, if they don't rotate crops, then after a few years disease and pests build up, and the only way to keep growing is with unnatural pesticides, etc.

    It's like God MADE the earth, and life, to follow certain rules. Also do research on pork and shellfish, you'll find them the most unhealthy and full of parasites.

    How could man, who thought the earth was flat until a few hundred years ago, thousands of years ago knew about giving the land a rest? Or just happen to know that pork and shellfish are the most unhealthy?

    We get away with this stuff today, because of technology and more sanitary methods. But those things, I realized were not just there as rules, but following them GAVE them life.

    Now the sabbath, resting from ALL work. If God GAVE that to us, our bodies may NEED a day each week to do nothing but fully rest. Depression, fatigue, we can't defy how we are made, and how our bodies operate. If we all truly were living today as supposed to, how much better would life be?

    Unfortunately there is only so much we can control. Unless you have enough land to grow your own food, you'll be stuck with food that is not very healthy. Social norms and work expectations may make it hard to take the rest your supposed to.

  • EndofMysteries

    PS - you may find this interesting....but many of those diseases and stuff, God has the cure and treatments already made for us. People who are quick to call everything 'conspiracy theory' will quickly dismiss this....but with some research, you'll find that natural cures and treatments do not make the medical industry any money, only what they can manipulate so it can be bottled and sold for lots of $$ but with tons of side effects do.

    Look up "raw apricot seeds" and "apple seeds" for cancer treatment for example. You'll find it was discovered in the 70's, that the I believe iodine or forgot the name, it's what makes those seeds supposedly poisonus. It was discovered there is an enymze in them, which releases the poison directly onto cancerous cells. But other then that, they are relatively safe to eat. (I've ate a bunch and no problems) Called vitamin b-17.

    A few years ago, a terminally ill cancer patient actually cured his cancer (shrank it to just bout nothing) with those seeds. He was jailed for 5 years for making those claims. (even though his doctors were in shock at what they did) On the studies in the 70's, the scientists if you research, the drug companies were VERY interested in finding a way to patent a medication or make a medication which does the same thing, but no way wanted a natural solution or the billions on the industry would be lost. (maybe also population control?)

    I don't expect anyone to believe this example, if you are interested in it, you can quickly find all the hard evidence via google.

    I'll leave this youtube vid though of the man who cured his cancer w/ the seeds (it did come back after he was jailed and unable to take them anymore) here is his own website, i think he's still alive....here is the news story of him <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJAiutL8JyU&feature=player_embedded"> jailed cancer patient </a>

  • EndofMysteries
  • PSacramento

    Interesting, thanks EOM.

  • EndofMysteries

    During 1950 after many years of research, a dedicated biochemist by the name of Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Jr., isolated a new vitamin that he numbered B17 and called 'Laetrile'. As the years rolled by, thousands became convinced that Krebs had finally found the complete control for all cancers, a conviction that even more people share today. Back in 1950 Ernst Krebs could have had little idea of the hornet's nest he was about to stir up. The pharmaceutical multinationals, unable to patent or claim exclusive rights to the vitamin, launched a propaganda attack of unprecedented viciousness against B17, despite the fact that hard proof of its efficiency in controlling all forms of cancer surrounds us in overwhelming abundance.

    In his brilliantly researched 1974 book "World Without Cancer", researcher and author G. Edward Griffin explains the trophoblastic theory of cancer proposed by Professor John Beard of Edinburgh University, which states that certain pre-embryonic cells in pregnancy differ in no discernible way from highly-malignant cancer cells. Edward Griffin continues:

    "The trophoblast in pregnancy indeed does exhibit all the classical characteristics of cancer. It spreads and multiplies rapidly as it eats its way into the uterus wall preparing a place where the embryo can attach itself for maternal protection and nourishment."

    The trophoblast is formed in a chain reaction by another cell that Griffin simplifies down to the 'total life' cell, which has the total capacity to evolve into any organ or tissue, or a complete embryo. When the total life cell is triggered into producing trophoblast by contact with the hormone estrogen, present in both males and females, one of two different things happens. In the case of pregnancy the result is conventional development of a placenta and umbilical cord. If the trophoblast is triggered as part of a healing process however, the result is cancer or, as Edward Griffin cautions: "To be more accurate, we should say it is cancer if the healing process is not terminated upon completion of its task."

    Stunning proof of this claim is readily available. All trophoblast cells produce a unique hormone called the chorionic gonadotrophic (CGH) which is easily detected in urine. Thus if a person is either pregnant or has cancer, a simple CGH pregnancy test should confirm either or both. It does, with an accuracy of better than 92% in all cases. If the urine sample shows positive it means either normal pregnancy or abnormal malignant cancer. Griffin notes: "If the patient is a woman, she either is pregnant or has cancer. If he is a man, cancer can be the only cause." So why all of the expensive, dangerous biopsies carried to 'detect' cancerous growths? One can only assume that medicare pays doctors a larger fee for biopsies than pregnancy tests.

    So how is it that any of us gets cancer in the first place. Is it exposure to cigarette smoking, intense sunlight or perhaps the effect of toxic food additives? Dr. Krebs thinks not. All of the hard iochemical evidence points to the fact that cancer is a simple deficiency disease of vitamin B17, long ago removed from our highly refined, western diets. Krebs postulates that the so-called 'carcinogens' are merely stress triggers that finally expose the B17 deficiency with devastating effect.

    The proof Krebs has presented over the years to support his claim is impressive. Centuries ago we used to eat millet bread, rich in B17, but now we chew our way through wheat which has none at all. For generations our grandmothers used to carefully crush the seeds of plums, green grapes, cherries, apples, apricots and other members of the botanical family Rosaceae, and diligently mix them with their home made jams and preserves. Grandma probably didn't know why she was doing it, but the seeds of all these fruits are the most potent source of B17 in the world. In the tropics, large quantities of B17 are found in cassava, also known as tapioca. When did you last eat some?

    Independent research has also proved that a Himalayan tribe known as the 'Hunza' never contract cancer of any kind so long as they stick to their native diet which is exceptionally high in both apricots and millet. However, once exposed to western diets they become as vulnerable as the rest of us.

    The implications of these findings are staggering of course. If we managed to control Scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) centuries ago, how is it we cannot do the same for cancer today? The fact of the matter is that we could if our respective governments would allow it. Unfortunately most governments have buckled under the pressure exerted by the pharmaceutical multinationals, the American Food & Drug Administration, and the American Medical Association. All three have mounted highly successful 'scare' campaigns based on the fact that vitamin B17 contains quantities of 'deadly' cyanide; conveniently forgetting that vitamin B12 also contains significant quantities of cyanide, and has long been available in health food shops world-wide.

    Dr. Kreb's B17 Laetrile was derived from apricot seeds and then synthesized into crystalline form using his own unique process. Suddenly, the American FDA bombarded the media with a story about an unfortunate couple who had poisoned themselves by eating raw apricot seeds in San Francisco. The story made headline news across the U.S.A. although several suspicious journalists never managed to establish the identity of the unfortunate couple, despite many determined attempts. But the multinational pharmaceutical/FDA boot had been put in with a vengeance. From that point onwards eating apricot seeds or B17 Laetrile became synonymous with committing suicide.

    Back in the fifties, Dr. Ernst Krebs proved beyond doubt that B17 was completely harmless to humans in the most convincing way possible. After testing the vitamin on animals, he filled a large hypodermic with a mega-dose which he then injected into his own arm! Drastic perhaps, but the adventurous Dr. Krebs is still alive and well today.

    The vitamin is harmless to healthy tissue for a very simple reason: Each molecule of B17 contains one unit of cyanide, one unit of benzaldehyde and two of glucose (sugar) tightly locked together. In order for the cyanide to become dangerous it is first necessary to 'unlock' the molecule to release it, a trick that can only be performed by an enzyme called beta-glucosidase. This enzyme is present all over the body in minute quantities, but in huge quantities (up to 100 times as high) at cancerous tumour sites.

    Thus the cyanide is released only at the cancer site with drastic results, which become utterly devastating to the cancer cells because the benzaldehyde unit also unlocks at the same time. Benzaldehyde is a deadly poison in its own right, which then acts synergistically with the cyanide to produce a poison 100 times more deadly than either in isolation. The combined effect on the cancer cells is best left to the imagination.

    But what about danger to the rest of the body's cells? Another enzyme, rhodanese, always present in larger quantities than the unlocking enzyme beta-glucosidase in healthy tissues has the easy ability to completely break down both cyanide and benzaldehyde into beneficial body products. Predictably perhaps, malignant cancer cells contain no rhodanese at all, leaving them completely at the mercy of the cyanide and benzaldehyde.

    Any physician reading this article will probably be shaking with self-righteous indignation at this stage, muttering to himself: 'Yes, but where is the PROOF???' Right here! Most people have heard of 'spontaneous remission', where the cancer simply goes away, hopefully never to reappear. Spontaneous remissions are exceedingly rare and vary from one form of cancer to another. One virulent variety known as testicular chorionepithelioma has never been known to produce a single spontaneous remission. Perhaps for that precise reason, Dr. Krebs singled it out for special attention when proving the effectiveness of B17 Laetrile in providing total control for cancers. As Edward Griffin recounts:

    "In a banquet speech in San Francisco on November 19, 1967, Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Jr., briefly reviewed six such cases. Then he added: Now there is an advantage in not having had prior radiation, because if you have not received prior radiation that has failed, then you cannot enjoy the imagined benefits of the delayed effects of prior radiation. So this boy falls into the category of the "spontaneous regression... "

    And when we look at this scientifically, we know that spontaneous regression occurs in fewer than one in 150,000 cases of cancer. The statistical possibility of spontaneous regression accounting for the complete resolution of successive cases of testicular chorionepithelioma is far greater than the statistical improbability of the sun not rising tomorrow morning."

    Wisely perhaps, Griffin notes that because of the adverse publicity against B17 Laetrile, and because of the difficulties in obtaining the 'banned' substance, most cancer sufferers turn to the vitamin as a last resort, long after they have been burned by radiation therapy, and/or poisoned by chemotherapy. He points out that once the body organs have been savagely damaged in this way, there is little if any chance of B17 Laetrile being able to effect a cure. The body is simply too far gone.

    When "World Without Cancer" was written back in 1974, B17 Laetrile was freely available in Australia. It is not now. A recent check with the Australian Cancer Foundation and health authorities revealed that nowadays Canberra considers each individual case on its merits, then decides whether the patient should be allowed to import sufficient of the material for his or her own personal use. If he or she manages to jump that hurdle, it is then his or her own responsibility to find a doctor prepared to inject it. Seemingly the multinational pharmaceutical lobbyists managed to get to our politicians before Dr. Krebs could get to the Australian public. Radiation and chemotherapy are highly profitable, and oncologists have to make a decent living...

    Only a few months ago Australian nationwide television carried the delightful information that two out of every three Australians can expect to suffer skin cancer at least once during their lifetimes. On the massive evidence provided by Dr. Ernst Krebs, Jr. and G. Edward Griffin, that figure could be crushed to a tiny percentage of the anticipated numbers if Australians were allowed freedom of choice where B17 Laetrile is concerned. It is time for Australians to take a stand on this lethal issue.

  • EndofMysteries

    NP PS -

    Research these things, but here I'll show 3 things for Cancer, Heart attacks, and FLU

    Few things I know so far.......for cancer or anybody who is suffering with it, look up Apricot Seeds, vitamin b-17, laeatrile

    For high blood pressure, or even a full blown heart attack, research "cayenne pepper and cayenne pepper extract" - many many claims of it stopping a heartattack and preventing brain damage. (the pepper causes muscle reflexes which open up the and unclog whats giving you the heart attack)

    For flu, instead of the medication which they don't even want to prescribe because it doesn't work, get "Black elderberry extract", should cure it in 3 days! Backed by studies too!

    O and all of these things have no side effects ;)

  • AGuest

    Interesting comments (may you all have peace!). Seems the question keeps coming up, lately, as to why the Most Holy One of Israel "allows" suffering, etc., why hasn't He stepped in and brought an end to all of [it]... and the responses have run the gamut. I must say that I do marvel that most seem to forget that He did step in once... to the detriment of all but six human... and a few animal ones. I can't imagine that, if asked, the people back then not only considered themselves to be (and hated the) "suffering" of their day. Problem was, apparently, that "ending" the suffering meant... ending them. Meaning, in some way or another, THEY were the CAUSE of the "suffering." And so, anything and everything... and anybody and everybody... that CAUSED "suffering"... had to go.

    My point? Are you CERTAIN, those of you who are "craving the day of JAH"... that you... and those YOU love... would BE "saved" through such a day? If so, just how sure are you?

    I have lost loved ones... even at a young age... to cancer and other tragedies. I have lost children... and almost lost a child who now lives. Yes, THIS life comes with pain of all sorts. I do not discount that or deny it. But that is the LOT... of life in a realm confined to what is physical. In THIS realm life... comes OUT of death. Take a plant, for example: does not the seed DIE before the plant comes forth? When you look at "rich" soil... what is IN that soil? Is it not death and decay?

    We, in the western world, I dunno. There are children in Africa who are orphaned as a result of heinous diseases, some of which are caused by "life" (i.e., malaria, dystentery), and some which were caused by man (HIV, AIDS - and no, I am NOT referring to homosexuality, but the experimentation on humans in the pursuit of "biological warfare" that brought this plague on). Yet, these children, if you asked them, do not consider their lives as "suffering" in such a manner as we do. We cry because the water isn't clean, yet cry because of the cost to clean it. Etc.

    I am grateful that the Most Holy One of Israel is patient. He does NOT want any to be destroyed. And, praise JAH, the world hasn't gotten SO bad, truly, that MANY should be. Most of us are merely victims of our environment and circumstances. Which environments and circumstances MAN chose... NOT God.

    Rather than crying, "When, O Lord?" like those who have already fallen asleep in death and are awaiting resurrection (they have lived their lives), shouldn't we be like Abraham, and say, "Wait a minute, Lord! What if there's 50 GOOD people on the earth? What if there are 10?!" What if there are 5?!" You get my drift. Abraham knew Sodom and Gomorrah were corrupt (and, if you read the account it was NOT because of homosexuality - rather, it was for things MUCH worse!). Yet, he felt PITY for those in those cities and pleaded to the Most Holy One of Israel on their behalf.

    Should not we, those of us who profess to belong to Christ, feel the same thing for the world in which WE now live? Shouldn't we hope that folks will GET IT... and begin to live in a manner that shows love... WITHOUT having to have the Most Holy One of Israel step in and "do something"? And shouldn't we not only share how that hope, but live OUR lives in "demonstration" of it? If so, how can hoping that God will destroy ANYBODY... be "righteous"?

    Dear ones, He will step in, at some point. Hopefully, though, we will have "gotten it" before He does... and/or He will have mercy on us ALL.

    Again, I bid you peace!

    A slave of Christ,


  • EndofMysteries


    Nice to see you know the truth about Aids too! Your definitely doing your homework!

    I hope to see more of your participation in the future.

Share this