Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16

by Yizuman 20 Replies latest social current

  • Yizuman
    Yizuman

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011367936_walgreens18m.html

    Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won't take any new Medicaid patients, saying that filling their prescriptions is a money-losing proposition — the latest development in an ongoing dispute over Medicaid reimbursement.

    The company, which operates 121 stores in the state, will continue filling Medicaid prescriptions for current patients.

    In a news release, Walgreens said its decision to not take new Medicaid patients stemmed from a "continued reduction in reimbursement" under the state's Medicaid program, which reimburses it at less than the break-even point for 95 percent of brand-name medications dispensed to Medicaid patents.

    Walgreens follows Bartell Drugs, which stopped taking new Medicaid patients last month at all 57 of its stores in Washington, though it still fills Medicaid prescriptions for existing customers at all but 15 of those stores.

    Doug Porter, the state's director of Medicaid, said Medicaid recipients should be able to readily find another pharmacy because "we have many more pharmacy providers in our network than we need" for the state's 1 million Medicaid clients.

    He said those who can't can contact the state's Medical Assistance Customer Service Center at 1-800-562-3022 for help in locating one.

    Along with Walgreens and Bartell, the Ritzville Drug Company in Adams County announced in November that it would stop participating in Medicaid.

    Fred Meyer and Safeway said their pharmacies would continue to serve existing Medicaid patients and to take new ones, though both expressed concern that the reimbursement rate is too low for pharmacies to make a profit.

    The amount private insurers and Medicaid pay pharmacies for prescriptions isn't the actual cost of those drugs but rather is based on what's called the drug's estimated average wholesale price. But that figure is more like the sticker price on a car than its actual wholesale cost.

    Washington was reimbursing pharmacies 86 percent of a drug's average wholesale price until July, when it began paying them just 84 percent. While pharmacies weren't happy about the reimbursement reduction, the Department of Social and Health Services said that move was expected to save the state about $10 million.

    Then in September came another blow. The average wholesale price is calculated by a private company, which was accused in a Massachusetts lawsuit of fraudulently inflating its figures. The company did not admit wrongdoing but agreed in a court settlement to ratchet its figures down by about 4 percent.

    That agreement took effect in September — and prompted a lawsuit by a group of pharmacies and trade associations that said Washington state didn't follow federal law in setting its reimbursement rate, and that that rate is too low. The lawsuit is pending.

    "Washington state Medicaid is now reimbursing pharmacies less than their cost of participation," said Jeff Rochon, CEO of the Washington State Pharmacy Association.

    Pharmacies that continue to fill Medicaid prescriptions at the current state reimbursement rate are "at risk of putting themselves out of business altogether," he said.

    ----------------------------------

    Here's the CHANGE you can believe in.

    Yiz

  • avatar
    avatar

    It's better change than you get holding in a tin cup from begging I guess

  • blondie
    blondie

    Effective April 16, Walgreens drugstores across the state won't take any new Medicaid patients

    This is only about the state of Washington, not throughout the US.

  • sir82
    sir82

    Isn't that good news to you, Yizuman?

    Sounds like a wonderful idea if you hold to Republican ideals. Taxpayers will no longer support all those lazy welfare-queen Medicaid cheaters who got their Prozac and Lipitor for free.

    One more blow against Socialized Medicine! Praise Rush!

  • Brocephus
    Brocephus

    Basic macroeconmic theory... You put price controls on something and if people can't make a profit on it they won't bother to produce it anymore.

  • Yizuman
    Yizuman
    Sounds like a wonderful idea if you hold to Republican ideals.

    Wait, what? Obama is a Republican?

    Yiz

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32

    I find it laughably hypocritical when an apparent republican/conservative/anti-liberal/anti-democrat type complains about increased difficulty in receiving WELFARE BENEFITS. (Not only on this thread but others.)

    But, on to the topic at hand...this is a bad thing. In an effort to balance the budget, a cut was made that was too deep. And this is a Washington state thing, not a federal government issue.

  • sir82
    sir82

    How does Obama control the decsions affecting one state made by the Walgreen's corporate board?

    You make no sense.

    Still, I thought Republicans were all for reduction of government spending on "socialized" programs like Medicaid.

    You do realize that Medicaid is a form of Socialism, right? Government redistribution of wealth from one group of people to another?

  • mrsjones5
    mrsjones5

    Well there are other places that will do it like Krogers, Walmart, Meijer, CVS, RiteAid, and Target if Walgreens extends their policy to Indiana or Nationwide. Let's hope they don't follow suit with Walgreens.

  • BizzyBee
    BizzyBee
    Here's the CHANGE you can believe in. Yiz

    Sounds like you're blaming the wrong guy.

    BTW, cuts to Medicaid are being considered or proposed by nearly every state:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/19/us/politics/19medicaid.html

    First to go: eyeglasses, adult day care, dentures and adult diapers cut from 300 per month to 186. Think about that!

    Hardest hit will be: low-income children, disabled adults and nursing homes.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit