Here's what I don't understand: Why is Indiana singled-out and crapped on when the statutory language at issue is laced throughout state and federal books? It seems to me the powers of Indiana have, for good or bad, done no more than many other powers have before them (and from very diverse political interests!).
Is Indiana getting its knuckles rapped because it took its leadership longer to draw up and and pass legislation others adopted long before?
What am I missing here? What is so different about Indiana's recent legislation compared with other state laws (plus federal)?