They are trained to not listen, so don't tell them anything.
They are trained to teach, so ask questions.
They are trained to change the subject if they don't like the question, so don't let them get away with it. Stay on topic.
Cheers
Chris
Undermining confidence in the wonderful Borg
by leo999 11 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
pixiesticks
I'm using the undeniable fact that the Watchtower lied, used many fallacies, misquoted and quoted out of context many scientists in the Evolution or Creation book as an 'in'. Not to mention the fact that the man that the Org hailed as a top evolutionary scientist in the book and heavily quoted from turned out to be nothing but a sensationalist tv script writer and paranormalist with no scientific qualifications what-so-ever.
I'm using this book because it's so undeniably poorly written that you can easily use it to show that the Org's books can't be relyed on as completely factual. I ask them "If this book can be full of so many mistakes, how can you trust that the rest of the Watchtower literature can be completely accurate?"This is a great article that highlights all the book's faults.
http://www.dimaggio.org/Heretic/critical.htm
Witnesses seem to find it easier to accept that just one of the Org's books is inaccurate first of all, but it instills enough doubt sometimes that they can begin questioning a bit. Then I find showing them that the Org paid out $781,250 in a child abuse case ( http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21917798 ) shocks them, because they know that it's their donated money that paid for that. From there, you can go onto the Org's UN affiliation with their NGO status ( http://www.randytv.com/secret/unitednations.htm ).