My thoughts on this is that they should not have even been on the curb of that organization. If we were seen in some questionable place, we would at the very least be counselled about not stumbling others and thus not even walk past the joint again. Now in the WBTS, the U.N NGO is a HUGE example of them going against the very man made rules they promulgate. This is possibly the biggest example of hypocrasy i came accross.
It does not matter what technical terms they want to use in their defense, it is proven that they KNEW the criteria for being an NGO with the DPI of the U.N. The word MEMBER may not be accurate, but for layman, we all know what we mean. Take away the word member and use asscoiated, it changes NOTHING really.
I too am only willing to believe and use what i find to be true and provable. This is. No amount of double speak and defense from them changes what i see in print.
Bottom line for me, is they can argue till they are blue in the face. Even IF they were innocent in not knowing the 'rules'
They just should never have never even thought about walking into that building.
Ignorance on the part of leaders in power is not an excuse either.